Every injection yields a bijection onto its image
From Maths
Stub grade: B
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Make sure this page is up to scratch before removing this. It should be pretty good; it'd be wrong to not mark it as a stub when it was made simply to be linked to
Contents
[hide]Statement
\newcommand{\f}{\overline{f}}Let X and Y be sets and suppose f:X\rightarrow Y is any injective map between them. Then we claim that there is a map:
- \overline{f}:X\rightarrow f(X) given by \overline{f}:x\mapsto f(x)- where f(X) denotes the image of X under f[Note 1]
that is a bijection between X and f(X) (that is to say, we claim that \f is a bijection, a bijection is any map that is both injective and surjective)
Proof
We must show that \f:X\rightarrow f(X) is a bijection (that means \f is both injective and surjective), even though injectiveness is (even more than surjectiveness) trivial, we do it anyway. That's why this page is marked as first-year friendly
- Injectivity of \f:X\rightarrow f(X) given by \f:x\mapsto f(x)
- We will take injectivity to mean: \forall x_1,x_2\in X[\f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2] (rather than other equivalent conditions documented on the injection page)
- Let x_1,x_2\in X be given
- Suppose \f(x_1)\ne\f(x_2)
- By the nature of logical implication we do not care if the RHS (x_1=x_2) is true or false.
- By the principle of excluded middle x_1=x_2 must be true xor false[Note 2], so we're done in either case.
- By the nature of logical implication we do not care if the RHS (x_1=x_2) is true or false.
- Suppose \f(x_1)=\f(x_2)
- In order for the implication to be true, we require that this means x_1=x_2
- Notice that \f(x_1)=f(x_1) and \f(x_2)=f(x_2) (by definition of \f)
- As f:X\rightarrow Y was injective itself, this means:
- \forall x_1,x_2\in X[\f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2]
- By hypothesis, \f(x_1)=\f(x_2) so f(x_1)=f(x_2)
- This means that x_1=x_2 by injectivity of f
- So \f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies f(x_1)=f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2 (then by transitivity of implies \f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2)
- We know \f(x_1)=\f(x_2) to be true, therefore, by definition of implies and by knowing \f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2 we must have:
- x_1=x_2
- We know \f(x_1)=\f(x_2) to be true, therefore, by definition of implies and by knowing \f(x_1)=\f(x_2)\implies x_1=x_2 we must have:
- This completes the first part of the proof
- Suppose \f(x_1)\ne\f(x_2)
- Surjectivity of \f:X\rightarrow f(X) given by \f:x\mapsto f(x)
- To be surjective we require: \forall y\in f(X)\exists x\in X[\f(x)=y]
- Let y\in f(X) be given
- By definition of f(X) (that is f(X):=\{y\in Y\ \vert\ \exists x\in X[f(x)=y]\} remember) we see:
- y\in f(X)\iff\exists x\in X[f(x)=y]
- Choose x\in X such that f(x)=y (which we can do thanks to the above)
- Now \f(x)=f(x) by definition of \f and
- f(x)=y by our choice of x
- So \f(x)=f(x)=y or just \f(x)=y
- Now \f(x)=f(x) by definition of \f and
- We have shown there exists an x\in X such that \f(x)=y for our given y
- By definition of f(X) (that is f(X):=\{y\in Y\ \vert\ \exists x\in X[f(x)=y]\} remember) we see:
- Since y\in f(X) was arbitrary we have shown this for all y
- That completes the surjectivity part of the proof
TODO: Check, I should have left this blank and marked it as low-hanging fruit....
Thus we have shown that \f:X\rightarrow f(X) given by \f:x\mapsto f(x) is a bijection
See also
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Formally:
- for A\in\mathcal{P}(X) we define f(A):=\{y\in Y\ \vert\ \exists a\in A[f(a)=y]\}
- f(X):=\{y\in Y\ \vert \exists x\in X[f(x)=y] \} - the set of all things in Y that are mapped to by f for some x\in X
- Jump up ↑ Xor means "exclusive or", A\text{ XOR }B means A or B is true and A\text{ AND }B is false. That is to say we have A or B but not both
References
|