Difference between revisions of "Simplex"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=A|msg=I don't like the ambient {{M|\mathbb{R}^N}} requirement, look to drop it. Also get more references}} __TOC__ ==Definition== Let {{M|\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\}\...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 14:03, 31 January 2017

Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
I don't like the ambient [ilmath]\mathbb{R}^N[/ilmath] requirement, look to drop it. Also get more references

Definition

Let [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^N[/ilmath] be a geometrically independent set in [ilmath]\mathbb{R}^N[/ilmath][Note 1]. We define the "[ilmath]n[/ilmath]-simplex", [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath], spanned by [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\} [/ilmath] to be the following set[1]:

  • [math]\sigma:\eq\left\{\ x\in\mathbb{R}^N\ \left\vert\ x\eq\sum^n_{i\eq 0}t_ia_i\wedge (t_i)_{i\eq 0}^n\subset\mathbb{R}\wedge \forall i\in\{0,\ldots,n\}\subset\mathbb{N}[t_i\ge 0]\wedge\sum_{i\eq 0}^n t_i\eq 1\right\}\right. [/math]

The numbers, [ilmath](t_i)_{i\eq 0}^n\subset\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] are uniquely determined by [ilmath]x[/ilmath] and are called the "barycentric coordinates" of [ilmath]x[/ilmath] with respect to [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\} [/ilmath]

Elementary properties

  1. [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath] is convex
  2. In fact [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath] is the convex hull of [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\} [/ilmath]
Grade: A
This page requires some work to be carried out
Some aspect of this page is incomplete and work is required to finish it
The message provided is:
See page 6 of[1] there's a list of 6 points. Could be useful

Terminology

  • Dimension: [ilmath]\text{Dim}(\sigma):\eq\vert\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\}\vert-1[/ilmath][1]
  • Vertices: the vertices of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath] are the points [ilmath]a_0,\ldots,a_n[/ilmath][1]
  • Face: any simplex spanned by [ilmath]A\in\big(\mathcal{P}(\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\})-\{\emptyset\}\big)[/ilmath] is called a face[1] of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath].
    • The face is a "proper face"[1] if it is not [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath] itself[Note 2].
    • TODO: I do not think the empty set is a face. I think Munkres was just being lax, check this
  • Face opposite [ilmath]a_i\in\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\} [/ilmath]: is the face spanned by [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\}-\{a_i\} [/ilmath] which is sometimes denoted [ilmath]\{a_0,\ldots,\hat{a_i},\ldots,a_n\} [/ilmath][Note 3]
  • Boundary: the union of all proper faces is the boundary of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath][1] denoted [ilmath]\text{Bd}(\sigma)[/ilmath][1] or [ilmath]\partial\sigma[/ilmath]
    • i.e. [ilmath]\partial\sigma:\eq \bigcup_{\tau\in K }\tau [/ilmath] where [ilmath]K:\eq \big(\mathcal{P}(\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\})-\{\emptyset,\{a_0,\ldots,a_n\}\}\big) [/ilmath]
  • Interior: [ilmath]\text{Int}(\sigma):\eq\sigma-\partial\sigma[/ilmath][1] - the interior is sometimes called an open simplex

Proof of claims

Grade: A
This page requires some work to be carried out
Some aspect of this page is incomplete and work is required to finish it
The message provided is:
The claim that the coordinates are unique and stuff is totally missing

Notes

  1. This means that [ilmath]N > n[/ilmath] - certainly. We may be able to go lower (to [ilmath]N\ge n[/ilmath]) but I don't want to at this time.
  2. [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath] is a face of itself. Much like [ilmath]\{a,b\}\subseteq\{a,b\} [/ilmath] is a subset, but [ilmath]\{a\}\subset\{a,b\} [/ilmath] is a proper subset of [ilmath]\{a,b\} [/ilmath]
  3. It is quite common to denote "deletion from the array" by a [ilmath]\hat{a} [/ilmath] for [ilmath]a\in[/ilmath] the array

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Elements of Algebraic Topology - James R. Munkres