User:Alec/Things not to forget/Q9 wreckage
From Maths
See:
Problem body
- So we have shown: (¬(Disjoint))⟹(∀p∈π(Ua)∩π(Ub)∃q∈π−1(π(Ua))∩π−1(π(Ub))[π(q)=p]) and by tidying up: (¬Disjoint)⟹(∀p∈π(Ua)∩π(Ub)∃q∈Ua∩Ub[π(q)=p])[Note 1]
- By contrapositive:
- [(¬Disjoint)⟹(∀p∈π(Ua)∩π(Ub)∃q∈Ua∩Ub[π(q)=p])]⟺[¬(∀p∈π(Ua)∩π(Ub)∃q∈Ua∩Ub[π(q)=p])⟹¬(¬Disjoint)]
- Arriving at: ¬(∀p∈π(Ua)∩π(Ub)∃q∈Ua∩Ub[π(q)=p])⟹Disjoint
Fix failed:
- clearly ∃q∈π−1(π(Ua))∩π−1(π(Ub)) such that π(q)=p[Note 2]
- However π−1(π(Ua))∩π−1(π(Ub))=Ua∩Ub and Ua∩Ub=∅ (by construction), so there does not exist such a q!
- If there is no q∈Ua∩Ub such that π(q)=p then p∉π(Ua)∩π(Ub)
- clearly ∃q∈π−1(π(Ua))∩π−1(π(Ub)) such that π(q)=p[Note 2]
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist for a group named "Note", but no corresponding <references group="Note"/>
tag was found, or a closing </ref>
is missing