Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring"
From Maths
("hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal") |
m (Moving large blocks of rubric into their own subpages) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Ideas== | ==Ideas== | ||
* Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper | * Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper | ||
− | ==Facts== | + | ==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]== |
− | + | {{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}} | |
− | + | ==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]== | |
− | + | {{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}} | {{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}} |
Revision as of 01:14, 8 April 2016
I'm writing down some "facts" so I don't keep redoing them on paper.
Contents
[hide]What I want to show
- H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) for a system of sets, S.
Ideas
- Maybe just try showing \subseteq for each side on paper
Facts
- An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
- Thus \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) with the additional property:
- \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\right]
- Thus \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) with the additional property:
- \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
- This means \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))=\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
- It also means \mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S)) is a \sigma-ring
- \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
- \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary
Proof of facts
- An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring \implies closed under countable unions
- It is a \sigma-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
- A hereditary system closed under countable union \implies it is a \sigma-ring
- closed under set-subtraction
- Let A,B\in\mathcal{H} for some hereditary system \mathcal{H} . Then:
- A-B\subseteq A, but \mathcal{H} contains A and therefore all subsets of A
- Thus \mathcal{H} is closed under set subtraction.
- Let A,B\in\mathcal{H} for some hereditary system \mathcal{H} . Then:
- Closed under countable union is given.
- closed under set-subtraction
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring \implies closed under countable unions
- \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
- It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
- Closed under countable union
- Let (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) (we need to show \implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))
- This means, for each A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) there is a B_n\in\mathcal{R} with A_n\subseteq B_n thus:
- \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})\exists(B_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\subseteq B_i]
- However \mathcal{R} is a \sigma-ring, thus:
- Define B:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n, notice B\in\mathcal{R}
- But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
- \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B, thus
- \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq B
- BUT \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) contains all subsets of all things in \mathcal{R} , thus contains all subsets of B.
- \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B, thus
- Thus \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
- This means, for each A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) there is a B_n\in\mathcal{R} with A_n\subseteq B_n thus:
- Thus \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is closed under countable union.
- Let (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) (we need to show \implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))
- \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
- Follows from fact 1. As \mathcal{H}(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing \mathcal{H}(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
- \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary
- Let A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) be given. We want to show that \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A) that B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)).
- If A\in\mathcal{H}(S), then \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)[B\in\mathcal{H}(S) but B\in\mathcal{H}(S)\implies B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
- We're done in this case.
- OTHERWISE: \exists(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=A\right] (by fact 3)
- Let B\in\mathcal{P}(A) be given.
- Define a new sequence, ({ B_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }\subseteq \mathcal{H}(S) , where B_i:=A_i\cap B
- A_i\cap B is a subset of A_i and A_i\in\mathcal{H}(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" A_i\cap B\subseteq A_i thus A_i\cap B:=B_i\in\mathcal{H}(S)
- Clearly B=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n (as B\subseteq A and A=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n)
- As \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S) contains all countable unions of things in \mathcal{H}(S) we know:
- \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n=B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
- Define a new sequence, ({ B_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }\subseteq \mathcal{H}(S) , where B_i:=A_i\cap B
- We have shown B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
- Let B\in\mathcal{P}(A) be given.
- If A\in\mathcal{H}(S), then \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)[B\in\mathcal{H}(S) but B\in\mathcal{H}(S)\implies B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
- We have completed the proof
- Let A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) be given. We want to show that \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A) that B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)).
TODO: It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".