Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
("hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal")
m (Moving large blocks of rubric into their own subpages)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Ideas==
 
==Ideas==
 
* Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper
 
* Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper
==Facts==
+
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]==
# An hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\iff}} it is closed under countable unions.
+
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}}
#* Thus {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} with the additional property:
+
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]==
#** {{M|1=\forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\right]}}<!--
+
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}}
  
FACT 2
 
-->
 
# {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is a {{sigma|ring}} (for any {{sigma|ring}}, {{M|\mathcal{R} }})
 
#* This means {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))=\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}}
 
#* It also means {{M|\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} is a {{sigma|ring}}<!--
 
 
FACT 3
 
-->
 
# {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union.
 
==Proof of facts==
 
# An hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\iff}} it is closed under countable unions.
 
## Hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\implies}} closed under countable unions
 
##* It ''is a {{sigma|ring}}'' which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
 
## A hereditary system closed under countable union {{M|\implies}} it is a {{sigma|ring}}
 
### closed under set-subtraction
 
###* Let {{M|A,B\in\mathcal{H} }} for some hereditary system {{M|\mathcal{H} }}. Then:
 
###** {{M|A-B\subseteq A}}, but {{M|\mathcal{H} }} contains {{M|A}} and therefore all subsets of {{M|A}}
 
###* Thus {{M|\mathcal{H} }} is closed under set subtraction.
 
### Closed under countable union is given.<!--
 
 
END OF PROOF OF FACT 1
 
 
-->
 
# {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is a {{sigma|ring}} (for any {{sigma|ring}}, {{M|\mathcal{R} }})
 
## It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
 
## Closed under countable union
 
##* Let {{M|1=(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} (we need to show {{M|1=\implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) }})
 
##** This means, for each {{M|A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} there is a {{M|B_n\in\mathcal{R} }} with {{M|A_n\subseteq B_n}} thus:
 
##*** {{M|1=\forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})\exists(B_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\subseteq B_i]}}
 
##** However {{M|\mathcal{R} }} is a {{sigma|ring}}, thus:
 
##*** Define {{M|1=B:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n}}, notice {{M|B\in\mathcal{R} }}
 
##** But a [[union of subsets is a subset of the union]], thus:
 
##*** {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B}}, thus
 
##**** {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq B}}
 
##*** BUT {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} contains all subsets of all things in {{M|\mathcal{R} }}, thus contains all subsets of {{M|B}}.
 
##** Thus {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}}
 
##* Thus {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is closed under countable union.<!--
 
 
END OF PROOF OF FACT 2
 
-->
 
# {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union.
 
#* Follows from fact 1. As {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
 
  
 
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}}
 
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}}

Revision as of 01:14, 8 April 2016

I'm writing down some "facts" so I don't keep redoing them on paper.

What I want to show

  • H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) for a system of sets, S.

Ideas

  • Maybe just try showing \subseteq for each side on paper

Facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
    • Thus \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) with the additional property:
      • \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\right]
  2. \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
    • This means \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))=\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
    • It also means \mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S)) is a \sigma-ring
  3. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
  4. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary

Proof of facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
    1. Hereditary system is a sigma-ring \implies closed under countable unions
      • It is a \sigma-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
    2. A hereditary system closed under countable union \implies it is a \sigma-ring
      1. closed under set-subtraction
        • Let A,B\in\mathcal{H} for some hereditary system \mathcal{H} . Then:
          • A-B\subseteq A, but \mathcal{H} contains A and therefore all subsets of A
        • Thus \mathcal{H} is closed under set subtraction.
      2. Closed under countable union is given.
  2. \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
    1. It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
    2. Closed under countable union
      • Let (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) (we need to show \implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))
        • This means, for each A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) there is a B_n\in\mathcal{R} with A_n\subseteq B_n thus:
          • \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})\exists(B_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\subseteq B_i]
        • However \mathcal{R} is a \sigma-ring, thus:
          • Define B:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n, notice B\in\mathcal{R}
        • But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
          • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B, thus
            • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq B
          • BUT \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) contains all subsets of all things in \mathcal{R} , thus contains all subsets of B.
        • Thus \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
      • Thus \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is closed under countable union.
  3. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
    • Follows from fact 1. As \mathcal{H}(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing \mathcal{H}(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
  4. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary
    • Let A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) be given. We want to show that \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A) that B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)).
      1. If A\in\mathcal{H}(S), then \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)[B\in\mathcal{H}(S) but B\in\mathcal{H}(S)\implies B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
        • We're done in this case.
      2. OTHERWISE: \exists(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=A\right] (by fact 3)
        • Let B\in\mathcal{P}(A) be given.
          • Define a new sequence, ({ B_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }\subseteq \mathcal{H}(S) , where B_i:=A_i\cap B
            • A_i\cap B is a subset of A_i and A_i\in\mathcal{H}(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" A_i\cap B\subseteq A_i thus A_i\cap B:=B_i\in\mathcal{H}(S)
          • Clearly B=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n (as B\subseteq A and A=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n)
          • As \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S) contains all countable unions of things in \mathcal{H}(S) we know:
            • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n=B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
        • We have shown B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
    • We have completed the proof



TODO: It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".