Difference between revisions of "Notes:Tensor product"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Right now (9/6/2015 @ 0827) I have two "definitions" of tensor products. One as detailed on Notes:ToMond and another as the book(s) I have read. ==Bilinear function== A f...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Snippets=
 +
Page 47 of notebook, example is {{M|\mathbb{R}^m\otimes\mathbb{R}^n}}
 +
 +
 +
=Notes=
 
Right now (9/6/2015 @ 0827) I have two "definitions" of tensor products. One as detailed on [[Notes:ToMond]] and another as the book(s) I have read.
 
Right now (9/6/2015 @ 0827) I have two "definitions" of tensor products. One as detailed on [[Notes:ToMond]] and another as the book(s) I have read.
  
Line 24: Line 29:
 
** <math>u\otimes(0v) = u\otimes 0_v</math>
 
** <math>u\otimes(0v) = u\otimes 0_v</math>
 
I am convinced that {{M|1=0_u\otimes v=u\otimes 0_v}} but I am not yet convinced that we must therefor have {{M|1==0_v\otimes 0_u}}
 
I am convinced that {{M|1=0_u\otimes v=u\otimes 0_v}} but I am not yet convinced that we must therefor have {{M|1==0_v\otimes 0_u}}
 +
====Solved====
 +
Page 46 of notebook, gist is to show that (u,v) is in the kernel when u=0 or v=0 (done on bilinear page) then suppose that <math>u\ne 0\wedge v\ne 0</math> and construct bilinear map with $f(u,v)\ne 0$ then by the characteristic property of the tensor product the tensor product is non zero.

Revision as of 17:14, 9 June 2015

Snippets

Page 47 of notebook, example is [ilmath]\mathbb{R}^m\otimes\mathbb{R}^n[/ilmath]


Notes

Right now (9/6/2015 @ 0827) I have two "definitions" of tensor products. One as detailed on Notes:ToMond and another as the book(s) I have read.

Bilinear function

A function, [ilmath]f:U\times V\rightarrow W[/ilmath] is bilinear if:

  • It is linear in both variables, that is:
    • [math]f(\alpha u_1+\beta u_2,v)=\alpha f(u_1,v) + \beta f(u_2,v)[/math] and
    • [math]f(u,\alpha v_1+\beta v_2)=\alpha f(u,v_1) + \beta f(u,v_2)[/math]

As can be seen on Bilinear map (which is a page in need of cleanup!)

Scalar multiplication

Note that:

  • [math]f(\lambda u,v)=\lambda f(u,v)[/math] and
  • [math]f(u,\lambda v)=\lambda f(u,v)[/math]

So we can conclude that:

  • [math]\lambda f(u,v)=f(\lambda u,v)=f(u,\lambda v)[/math]

Tensor product

The tensor product of the vector spaces is [ilmath]U\otimes V[/ilmath] and the elements are [ilmath]u\otimes v[/ilmath] for a bilinear function: [ilmath]\otimes:U\times V\rightarrow W[/ilmath]

Questions

What is the 0 tensor

I have been told that the [ilmath]0[/ilmath] of [ilmath]U\otimes V[/ilmath] is [ilmath]0_U\otimes 0_V[/ilmath] however I am not convinced of this yet. What I do know that the [ilmath]0[/ilmath] vector is given by the [ilmath]0[/ilmath] scalar multiplied by any vector, so I know:

  • [math]0(u\otimes v)=[/math]
    • [math](0u)\otimes v=0_u\otimes v[/math]
    • [math]u\otimes(0v) = u\otimes 0_v[/math]

I am convinced that [ilmath]0_u\otimes v=u\otimes 0_v[/ilmath] but I am not yet convinced that we must therefor have [ilmath]=0_v\otimes 0_u[/ilmath]

Solved

Page 46 of notebook, gist is to show that (u,v) is in the kernel when u=0 or v=0 (done on bilinear page) then suppose that [math]u\ne 0\wedge v\ne 0[/math] and construct bilinear map with $f(u,v)\ne 0$ then by the characteristic property of the tensor product the tensor product is non zero.