Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts"
From Maths
(Created page with "# An hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\iff}} it is closed under countable unions. ## Hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\implies}} closed under countable unions ##* It...") |
m |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
--> | --> | ||
# {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union. | # {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union. | ||
− | #* Follows from fact 1. As {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators) | + | #* Follows from fact 1. As {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)<!-- |
+ | |||
+ | END OF PROOF OF FACT 3 | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | # {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is hereditary | ||
+ | #* Let {{M|A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} be given. We want to show that {{M|\forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)}} that {{M|B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}. | ||
+ | #*# If {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(S)}}, then {{M|\forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)[B\in\mathcal{H}(S)}} but {{M|B\in\mathcal{H}(S)\implies B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} | ||
+ | #*#* We're done in this case. | ||
+ | #*# OTHERWISE: {{M|1=\exists(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=A\right]}} (by fact 3) | ||
+ | #*#* Let {{M|B\in\mathcal{P}(A)}} be given. | ||
+ | #*#** Define a new sequence, {{MSeq|B_n|in=\mathcal{H}(S) }}, where {{M|1=B_i:=A_i\cap B}} | ||
+ | #*#*** {{M|A_i\cap B}} is a subset of {{M|A_i}} and {{M|A_i\in\mathcal{H}(S)}}, as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" {{M|A_i\cap B\subseteq A_i}} thus {{M|1=A_i\cap B:=B_i\in\mathcal{H}(S)}} | ||
+ | #*#** Clearly {{M|1=B=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n}} (as {{M|B\subseteq A}} and {{M|1=A=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n}}) | ||
+ | #*#** As {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)}} contains all countable unions of things in {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} we know: | ||
+ | #*#*** {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n=B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} | ||
+ | #*#* We have shown {{M|B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} | ||
+ | #* We have completed the proof |
Latest revision as of 02:23, 8 April 2016
- An hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟺ it is closed under countable unions.
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟹ closed under countable unions
- It is a σ-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
- A hereditary system closed under countable union ⟹ it is a σ-ring
- closed under set-subtraction
- Let A,B∈H for some hereditary system H. Then:
- A−B⊆A, but H contains A and therefore all subsets of A
- Thus H is closed under set subtraction.
- Let A,B∈H for some hereditary system H. Then:
- Closed under countable union is given.
- closed under set-subtraction
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟹ closed under countable unions
- H(R) is a σ-ring (for any σ-ring, R)
- It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
- Closed under countable union
- Let (An)∞n=1⊆H(R) (we need to show ⟹⋃∞n=1An∈H(R))
- This means, for each An∈H(R) there is a Bn∈R with An⊆Bn thus:
- ∀(An)∞n=1⊆H(R)∃(Bn)∞n=1⊆R∀i∈N[Ai⊆Bi]
- However R is a σ-ring, thus:
- Define B:=⋃∞n=1Bn, notice B∈R
- But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆⋃∞n=1Bn:=B, thus
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆B
- BUT H(R) contains all subsets of all things in R, thus contains all subsets of B.
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆⋃∞n=1Bn:=B, thus
- Thus ⋃∞n=1An∈H(R)
- This means, for each An∈H(R) there is a Bn∈R with An⊆Bn thus:
- Thus H(R) is closed under countable union.
- Let (An)∞n=1⊆H(R) (we need to show ⟹⋃∞n=1An∈H(R))
- σR(H(S)) is just H(S) closed under countable union.
- Follows from fact 1. As H(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing H(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
- σR(H(S)) is hereditary
- Let A∈σR(H(S)) be given. We want to show that ∀B∈P(A) that B∈σR(H(S)).
- If A∈H(S), then ∀B∈P(A)[B∈H(S) but B∈H(S)⟹B∈σR(H(S))
- We're done in this case.
- OTHERWISE: ∃(An)∞n=1⊆H(S)[⋃∞n=1An=A] (by fact 3)
- Let B∈P(A) be given.
- Define a new sequence, (Bn)∞n=1⊆H(S), where Bi:=Ai∩B
- Ai∩B is a subset of Ai and Ai∈H(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" Ai∩B⊆Ai thus Ai∩B:=Bi∈H(S)
- Clearly B=⋃∞n=1Bn (as B⊆A and A=⋃∞n=1An)
- As σR(H(S) contains all countable unions of things in H(S) we know:
- ⋃∞n=1Bn=B∈σR(H(S))
- Define a new sequence, (Bn)∞n=1⊆H(S), where Bi:=Ai∩B
- We have shown B∈σR(H(S))
- Let B∈P(A) be given.
- If A∈H(S), then ∀B∈P(A)[B∈H(S) but B∈H(S)⟹B∈σR(H(S))
- We have completed the proof
- Let A∈σR(H(S)) be given. We want to show that ∀B∈P(A) that B∈σR(H(S)).