The set of all [ilmath]\mu^*[/ilmath]-measurable sets is a ring

From Maths
Revision as of 21:26, 24 May 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:The set of all {{M|\mu^*}}-measurable sets is a ring}}{{Stub page|grade=A*}} ==Statement== {{M|\mathcal{S} }}, The set of all mu*-measurable sets|the set of a...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.

Statement

[ilmath]\mathcal{S} [/ilmath], the set of all [ilmath]\mu^*[/ilmath] measurable sets, is a ring of sets[1].

Recall that given an outer-measure, [ilmath]\mu^*:H\rightarrow\bar{\mathbb{R} }_{\ge 0} [/ilmath], where [ilmath]H[/ilmath] is a hereditary [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-ring that we call a set, [ilmath]A\in H[/ilmath] [ilmath]\mu^*[/ilmath]-measurable if[1]:

Proof

Recall what we must show in order for [ilmath]\mathcal{S} [/ilmath] to be a ring of sets:

It is sufficient to show only:

  • [ilmath]\forall A,B\in \mathcal{S}[A\cup B\in \mathcal{S}][/ilmath]
  • [ilmath]\forall A,B\in \mathcal{S}[A-B\in \mathcal{S}][/ilmath]
(Unknown grade)
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Extremely well documented in Halmos

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Measure Theory - Paul R. Halmos