Talk:Passing to the quotient (function)/Induced is surjective iff function is surjective
From Maths
Reminder
Diagram |
---|
- ∀a,b∈X[(w(a)=w(b))⟹(f(a)=f(b))]
then we may "factor f through w to yield:
- A function, ˉf:W→Y well defined by ˉf:w↦f(w−1(w)) such that:
- f=ˉf∘w
- Furthermore, if w:X→W is surjective then the induced ˉf:W→Y is unique].
The w and W represent "whatever", anything.
Claim
- If f is surjective then ˉf is surjective
Utility
- Useful property to have when factoring, isn't difficult, can be applied to many things (especially anything involving isomorphisms)
- Motivated by the first group isomorphism theorem, in fact I'm writing this for use there.
Proof
Suppose f is surjective. We wish to show that ˉf is too.
- Note: f is surjective means:
- ∀y∈Y∃x∈X[f(x)=y]
We may now begin the proof. We wish to show ∀y∈Y∃a∈W[ˉf(a)=y]
- Let y∈Y be given.
- By hypothesis: ∃x∈X[f(x)=y]
- Pick x∈X such that f(x)=y.
- Note that by the other part of the hypothesis:
- f=ˉf∘w so
- y=f(x)=(ˉf∘w)(x)=ˉf(w(x))
- Note that by the other part of the hypothesis:
- Choose a∈W by a:=w(x)
- Now ˉf(a)=y
- This completes the proof.
Notes
On paper I've been rather unhappy with this proof, I actually tried to go by contradiction, starting with:
- ∃y∈Y∀a∈W[ˉf(a)≠y]
And hoping to reach a contradiction, but I didn't really "contradict". Obviously I got to "but we see ˉf is the negation of (not surjective), but it didn't seem to have a contradiction in it as such.
I'm not sure what I was unhappy about though!