Talk:Passing to the quotient (function)/Induced is surjective iff function is surjective

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

Reminder

Diagram
If f:XY is a function and w:XW another function such that:
  • a,bX[(w(a)=w(b))(f(a)=f(b))]

then we may "factor f through w to yield:

  • A function, ˉf:WY well defined by ˉf:wf(w1(w)) such that:
    • f=ˉfw
  • Furthermore, if w:XW is surjective then the induced ˉf:WY is unique].

The w and W represent "whatever", anything.

Claim

  • If f is surjective then ˉf is surjective

Utility

  • Useful property to have when factoring, isn't difficult, can be applied to many things (especially anything involving isomorphisms)
  • Motivated by the first group isomorphism theorem, in fact I'm writing this for use there.

Proof

Suppose f is surjective. We wish to show that ˉf is too.

  • Note: f is surjective means:
    • yYxX[f(x)=y]

We may now begin the proof. We wish to show yYaW[ˉf(a)=y]

  • Let yY be given.
    • By hypothesis: xX[f(x)=y]
    • Pick xX such that f(x)=y.
      • Note that by the other part of the hypothesis:
        • f=ˉfw so
      • y=f(x)=(ˉfw)(x)=ˉf(w(x))
    • Choose aW by a:=w(x)
      • Now ˉf(a)=y
  • This completes the proof.

Notes

On paper I've been rather unhappy with this proof, I actually tried to go by contradiction, starting with:

  • yYaW[ˉf(a)y]

And hoping to reach a contradiction, but I didn't really "contradict". Obviously I got to "but we see ˉf is the negation of (not surjective), but it didn't seem to have a contradiction in it as such.

I'm not sure what I was unhappy about though!