Difference between revisions of "Site:This project"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(better implementation is on EoM)
m (Responding)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
By the way, about pictures: here they are implemented as on Wikipedia, I guess. A much better implementation is on EoM; there I had the joy making [https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Cantor_ternary_function this] and [https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Wild_knot that] and more pictures. [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 21:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 
By the way, about pictures: here they are implemented as on Wikipedia, I guess. A much better implementation is on EoM; there I had the joy making [https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Cantor_ternary_function this] and [https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Wild_knot that] and more pictures. [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 21:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 +
: I had noticed they had an asymptote module installed. I'm looking into this. I think it's really important that when one zooms detail isn't lost (so the content looks sharp even on high resolution displays) and I'm looking into options. I've written an SVG plotting library and I plan to merge it with this, to use it for graphs and diagrams. I don't want to re-invent the wheel. That second link (the knot) looks amazing though.
 +
:: If you look at this, [[File:Sequencelimit.gif]] - it is really bad (screen capture of graphic calculator), however Geogebra isn't bad. I cannot find some examples I did but it offered some VERY nice export features. I'll keep an eye on this. Thanks [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 22:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:22, 19 March 2016

Isn't it a good idea to have such a local discussion club, similarly to this and this? Boris (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I try and keep a log of different projects. For the last week I've been orbiting the oldest pages and marking them as dire/needing-references/poor-quality, so forth, it is predominantly just me or someone I'm often emailing or talking to so there hasn't been a point. Alec (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

By the way, about pictures: here they are implemented as on Wikipedia, I guess. A much better implementation is on EoM; there I had the joy making this and that and more pictures. Boris (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

I had noticed they had an asymptote module installed. I'm looking into this. I think it's really important that when one zooms detail isn't lost (so the content looks sharp even on high resolution displays) and I'm looking into options. I've written an SVG plotting library and I plan to merge it with this, to use it for graphs and diagrams. I don't want to re-invent the wheel. That second link (the knot) looks amazing though.
If you look at this, Sequencelimit.gif - it is really bad (screen capture of graphic calculator), however Geogebra isn't bad. I cannot find some examples I did but it offered some VERY nice export features. I'll keep an eye on this. Thanks Alec (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)