Difference between revisions of "Sigma-algebra"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Definition)
m (Reverted edits by JessicaBelinda133 (talk) to last revision by Alec)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* if <math>A\in S</math> then <math>A^c\in S</math>
 
* if <math>A\in S</math> then <math>A^c\in S</math>
 
* if <math>\{A_n\}_{n=1}^\infty\subset S</math> then <math>\cup^\infty_{n=1}A_n\in S</math>
 
* if <math>\{A_n\}_{n=1}^\infty\subset S</math> then <math>\cup^\infty_{n=1}A_n\in S</math>
That is it esd Theorem}}
+
That is it is closed under [[Complement|complement]] and [[Countable|countable]] [[Union|union]].<br/>
 +
===Immediate consequences===
 +
Among other things immediately we see that:
 +
{{Begin Inline Theorem}}
 +
* {{M|\mathcal{A} }} is closed under [[Set subtraction|set subtraction]]
 +
{{Begin Inline Proof}}
 +
:: As {{M|1=A-B=(A^c\cup B)^c}} and a {{sigma|algebra}} is closed under complements and unions, this shows it is closed under set subtraction too
 +
{{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}}
 
{{Begin Inline Theorem}}
 
{{Begin Inline Theorem}}
 
* {{M|\emptyset\in\mathcal{A} }}
 
* {{M|\emptyset\in\mathcal{A} }}
Line 22: Line 29:
 
{{Begin Inline Proof}}
 
{{Begin Inline Proof}}
 
:: To prove this we must check:
 
:: To prove this we must check:
::# {{M|\mathcalyes} is closed under [[Set subtraction|set subtraction]]
+
::# {{M|\mathcal{A} }} is closed under countable union
 +
::#* True by definition of {{Sigma|algebra}}
 +
::# {{M|\mathcal{A} }} is closed under [[Set subtraction|set subtraction]]
 
::#* We've already shown this, so this is true too.  
 
::#* We've already shown this, so this is true too.  
 
:: This completes the proof.
 
:: This completes the proof.
 
{{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}}
 
{{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}}
 
 
==Important theorems==
 
==Important theorems==
 
{{Begin Theorem}}
 
{{Begin Theorem}}

Revision as of 16:26, 23 August 2015

A Sigma-algebra of sets, or [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra is very similar to a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-ring of sets.

Like how ring of sets and algebra of sets differ, the same applies to [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-ring compared to [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra

Definition

A non empty class of sets [ilmath]S[/ilmath] is a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra[Note 1] if[1][2]

  • if [math]A\in S[/math] then [math]A^c\in S[/math]
  • if [math]\{A_n\}_{n=1}^\infty\subset S[/math] then [math]\cup^\infty_{n=1}A_n\in S[/math]

That is it is closed under complement and countable union.

Immediate consequences

Among other things immediately we see that:


As [ilmath]A-B=(A^c\cup B)^c[/ilmath] and a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra is closed under complements and unions, this shows it is closed under set subtraction too

  • [ilmath]\emptyset\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath]


[ilmath]\forall A\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] we have [ilmath]A-A\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] (by closure under set subtraction), as [ilmath]A-A=\emptyset[/ilmath], [ilmath]\emptyset\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath]

  • [ilmath]X\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath][Note 2]


As [ilmath]\emptyset\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] and it is closed under complement we see that [ilmath]\emptyset^c\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] (by closure under complement) and [ilmath]\emptyset^c=X[/ilmath] - the claim follows.

  • [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra [ilmath]\implies[/ilmath] [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-ring


To prove this we must check:
  1. [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is closed under countable union
    • True by definition of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra
  2. [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is closed under set subtraction
    • We've already shown this, so this is true too.
This completes the proof.

Important theorems

The intersection of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebras is a [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebra




TODO: Proof - see PTACC page 5, also in Halmos AND in that other book



Common [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebras

See also: Index of common [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebras

See also

Notes

  1. Some books (notably Measures, Integrals and Martingales) give [ilmath]X\in\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] as a defining property of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebras, however the two listed are sufficient to show this (see the immediate consequences section)
  2. Measures, Integrals and Martingales puts this in the definition of [ilmath]\sigma[/ilmath]-algebras

References

  1. Halmos - Measure Theory - page 28 - Springer - Graduate Texts in Mathematics - 18
  2. Measures, Integrals and Martingales - Rene L. Schilling