Notes:Stone-Weierstrass theorem

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

Overview

I have come up with something that is not logically equivalent to the form in the lecture notes. I document them here in the hope of showing it to someone who can tell me what form to commit to.

I claim B is strictly corollary to A, that is AB but B (does not imply) A

  • TODO: Find LaTeX not implies symbol is awful, is too short

Forms

A

Let (K,\mathcal{ J }) be a compact topological space and let \mathcal{A}\in\mathcal{P}(C(K,\mathbb{K})) be givenImportant:[Note 1] such that:

  1. \mathcal{A} is a sub-algebra[Note 2] of C(K,\mathbb{K})
  2. \forall x\in K\exists f\in\mathcal{A}[f(x)\neq 0] - \mathcal{A} vanishes at no points in K
  3. \forall x_1,x_2\in K\big[x_1\neq x_2\implies \exists f\in \mathcal{A}[f(x_1)\neq f(x_2)]\big] - \mathcal{A} separates points in K
  4. \forall f\in\mathcal{A}\exists g\in\mathcal{A}\forall x\in K[f(x)\eq (g(x))^\ast][Note 3] - \mathcal{A} is closed under complex conjugate

Then \mathcal{A} is dense in C(K,\mathbb{K}) where C(K,\mathbb{K}) is considered with the uniform norm (AKA: infinity norm, sup norm), \Vert\cdot\Vert_\infty:f\mapsto\mathop{\text{Sup} }_{x\in K}(\vert f(x)\vert).

B

Let (K,d) be a compact metric space, Let \mathcal{A}\in\mathcal{P}(C(K,\mathbb{R})) such that:

  1. \mathcal{A} is a sub-algebra of C(K,\mathbb{R})
  2. \exists c\in\mathbb{R}\exists f\in\mathcal{A}\forall x\in K[c\neq 0\wedge f(x)\eq c][Note 4] - there exists a non-zero constant function in \mathcal{A}
  3. \forall x_1,x_2\in K\big[x_1\neq x_2\implies \exists f\in \mathcal{A}[f(x_1)\neq f(x_2)]\big] - \mathcal{A} separates points in K

Then \mathcal{A} is dense in C(K,\mathbb{R}) - where C(K,\mathbb{R}) is considered with the uniform norm (AKA: infinity norm, sup norm), \Vert\cdot\Vert_\infty:f\mapsto\mathop{\text{Sup} }_{x\in K}(\vert f(x)\vert)

Proof of claim

Proof that A\implies B

Let the conditions of B be given. I.e. a compact metric space and so forth. All metric spaces are topological spaces (see topology induced by a metric) so that is met. Claim A covers both \mathbb{K}:\eq\mathbb{R} and \mathbb{K}:\eq\mathbb{C} - we have this covered by the first case. We require \mathcal{A} to be a sub-algebra, the existence of a constant non-zero function implies the vanishes nowhere condition of A. They both require the separation of points, because B deals with \mathbb{R} the complex conjugate thing is satisfied as the complex conjugate of a real valued function is just itself.

Thus by A we have B. As required.

Proof that B doesn't imply A

Suppose we have a non-metricisable topological space, we cannot invoke A to speak of its truth or falseness.

Comments

A

  1. Note: I only used this once in the proof. I showed that in the case of \mathbb{K}:\eq\mathbb{R} that:
    • \forall x\in K[g(t)>f(t)-\epsilon] \implies \forall x\in K[ f(t)-g(t) <\epsilon] \implies \Vert f-g\Vert_\infty<\epsilon.
      • If this can be shown for other norms, there should not be a problem extending it.

Notes

  1. Jump up There are a lot of Ks in play here. As per Doctrine:Notation for sets of continuous maps we use:
  2. Jump up Like every sub construction but for an algebra
  3. Jump up z^\ast denotes the complex conjugate of z\in\mathbb{C}
  4. Jump up This might be a good example of when to use and vs implies. If we'd used \implies in place of \wedge it'd completely change the meaning

References