Connected (topology)

From Maths
(Redirected from Connected subset (topology))
Jump to: navigation, search
Grade: A
This page is currently being refactored (along with many others)
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. It just means the page doesn't conform to the style of the site (usually due to age) or a better way of presenting the information has been discovered.
The message provided is:
Ancient page, needs an update, linking to theorems, so forth
There are many ways to state connectedness, and one can just as well start with disconnected and then define "connected" as "not disconnected". I have attempted to pick one and mention the others, do not be put off if you have found another definition! I have started with the most intuitive definition


Let [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath] be a topological space. We say [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is connected if[1]:

There are equivalent definitions, some are given below. Note also, that by this convention the [ilmath]\emptyset[/ilmath] is connected.

Recall the definition of a topological space being disconnected

A topological space, [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath], is said to be disconnected if[1]:

  • [ilmath]\exists U,V\in\mathcal{J}[U\ne\emptyset\wedge V\neq\emptyset\wedge V\cap U=\emptyset\wedge U\cup V=X][/ilmath], in words "if there exists a pair of disjoint and non-empty open sets, [ilmath]U[/ilmath] and [ilmath]V[/ilmath], such that their union is [ilmath]X[/ilmath]"

In this case, [ilmath]U[/ilmath] and [ilmath]V[/ilmath] are said to disconnect [ilmath]X[/ilmath][1] and are sometimes called a separation of [ilmath]X[/ilmath].

Of a subset

Let [ilmath]A\in\mathcal{P}(X)[/ilmath] be an arbitrary subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath], then:

  • we say [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is connected if it is connected when considered as a topological subspace of [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath][1][2].

There are equivalent definitions, some are given below.

Equivalent conditions

To a topological space [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath] being connected:

To an arbitrary subset, [ilmath]A\in\mathcal{P}(X)[/ilmath], being connected:

See also

TODO: Flesh out, add more theorems, for example image of a connected set is connected, so forth


  1. We could write this as:
    • [ilmath]\neg(\exists U,V\in\mathcal{J}[U\ne\emptyset\wedge V\neq\emptyset\wedge U\cap V=\emptyset\wedge U\cup V=X])[/ilmath]
    Which is:
    • [ilmath]\forall U,V\in\mathcal{J}[U=\emptyset\vee V=\emptyset\vee U\cap V\ne\emptyset\vee U\cup V\ne X][/ilmath]
    but, whilst completely "true", this is difficult to read and far less intuitive.


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee
  2. 2.0 2.1 Introduction to Topology - Bert Mendelson



A topological space [math](X,\mathcal{J})[/math] is connected if there is no separation of [math]X[/math][1] A separation of [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is:

  • A pair of non-empty open sets in [ilmath]X[/ilmath], which we'll denote as [math]U,\ V[/math] where:
    1. [math]U\cap V=\emptyset[/math] and
    2. [math]U\cup V=X[/math]

If there is no such separation then the space is connected[2]

Equivalent definition

This definition is equivalent (true if and only if) the only empty sets that are both open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] are:

  1. [ilmath]\emptyset[/ilmath] and
  2. [ilmath]X[/ilmath] itself.

I will prove this claim now:

Claim: A topological space [math](X,\mathcal{J})[/math] is connected if and only if the sets [math]X,\emptyset[/math] are the only two sets that are both open and closed.

Connected[math]\implies[/math]only sets both open and closed are [math]X,\emptyset[/math]

Suppose [math]X[/math] is connected and there exists a set [math]A[/math] that is not empty and not all of [math]X[/math] which is both open and closed. Then as :this is closed, [math]X-A[/math] is open. Thus [math]A,X-A[/math] is a separation, contradicting that [math]X[/math] is connected.

Only sets both open and closed are [math]X,\emptyset\implies[/math]connected


Connected subset

A subset [ilmath]A[/ilmath] of a Topological space [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] is connected if (when considered with the Subspace topology) the only two Relatively open and Relatively closed (in A) sets are [ilmath]A[/ilmath] and [ilmath]\emptyset[/ilmath][3]

Useful lemma

Given a topological subspace [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] of a space [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] we say that [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is disconnected if and only if:

  • [math]\exists U,V\in\mathcal{J}[/math] such that:
    • [math]Y\subseteq U\cup V[/math] and
    • [math]U\cap V\subseteq C(Y)[/math] and
    • Both [math]U\cap Y\ne\emptyset[/math] and [math]V\cap Y\ne\emptyset[/math]

This is basically says there has to be a separation of [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] that isn't just [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] and the [ilmath]\emptyset[/ilmath] for [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] to be disconnected, but the sets may overlap outside of {{M|Y}

Proof of lemma:



Theorem:Given a topological subspace [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] of a space [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] we say that [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is disconnected if and only if [math]\exists U,V\in\mathcal{J}[/math] such that: [math]A\subseteq U\cup V[/math], [math]U\cap V\subseteq C(A)[/math], [math]U\cap A\ne\emptyset[/math] and [math]V\cap A\ne\emptyset[/math]

TODO: Mendelson p115

Theorem: The image of a connected set is connected under a continuous map

TODO: Mendelson p116


  1. Topology - James R. Munkres - 2nd edition
  2. Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
  3. Introduction to topology - Mendelson - third edition