Difference between revisions of "Compact-to-Hausdorff theorem"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Proof)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
: Let {{M|U\subseteq X}} be a given open set
 
: Let {{M|U\subseteq X}} be a given open set
 
:: {{M|U}} open {{M|\implies X-U}} is closed {{M|\implies X-U}} is [[Compactness|compact]]
 
:: {{M|U}} open {{M|\implies X-U}} is closed {{M|\implies X-U}} is [[Compactness|compact]]
::* (Using the compactness of {{M|X}}) - a [[Closed set in compact space is compact]])
+
::* (Using the compactness of {{M|X}}) - a [[Closed set in a compact space is compact]])
 
:: {{M|\implies f(X-U)}} is compact
 
:: {{M|\implies f(X-U)}} is compact
 
::* (Using [[Image of a compact set is compact]])
 
::* (Using [[Image of a compact set is compact]])
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
As {{M|1=f=(f^{-1})^{-1} }} we have shown that a continuous bijective function's inverse is continuous, '''thus {{M|f}} is a homeomorphism'''
 
As {{M|1=f=(f^{-1})^{-1} }} we have shown that a continuous bijective function's inverse is continuous, '''thus {{M|f}} is a homeomorphism'''
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 12:36, 13 August 2015

Statement

Given a continuous and bijective function between two topological spaces [ilmath]f:X\rightarrow Y[/ilmath] where [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is compact and [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is Hausdorff

Proof

We wish to show [ilmath](f^{-1})^{-1}(U)[/ilmath] is open (where [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath]), that is that the inverse of [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is continuous.

Proof:

Let [ilmath]U\subseteq X[/ilmath] be a given open set
[ilmath]U[/ilmath] open [ilmath]\implies X-U[/ilmath] is closed [ilmath]\implies X-U[/ilmath] is compact
[ilmath]\implies f(X-U)[/ilmath] is compact
[ilmath]\implies f(X-U)[/ilmath] is closed in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath]
[ilmath]\implies Y-f(X-U)[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath]
But [ilmath]Y-f(X-U)=f(U)[/ilmath]
  • So we conclude [ilmath]f(U)[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath]

As [ilmath]f=(f^{-1})^{-1}[/ilmath] we have shown that a continuous bijective function's inverse is continuous, thus [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is a homeomorphism

References

  1. Introduction to Topology - Nov 2013 - Lecture Notes - David Mond