Difference between revisions of "Bounded set"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " ==Notes== {{Todo|Surely this can be generalised to an arbitrary Metric space}} ==Of {{M|\mathbb{R}^n}}== Given a set {{M|A\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n}} we say {{M|A}} is bound...")
 
(Being refactoring, actually have a reference to metric space version instead! Going to create equivalent conditions)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
{{Stub page|grade=A|msg=Needs fleshing out}}
 +
{{Refactor notice|grade=A|msg=I've found a definition!}}
 +
__TOC__
 +
==Definition==
 +
Let {{M|(X,d)}} be a [[metric space]]. Let {{M|A\in\mathcal{P}(X)}} be an arbitrary [[subset of]] {{M|X}}. Then we say "{{M|A}} is bounded in {{M|(X,d)}}" if{{rFAVIDMH}}:
 +
* {{M|1=\exists C<\infty\ \forall a,b\in A[d(a,b)<C]}} - where {{M|C}} is real<ref group="Note">{{M|C\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} }} should do as {{M|0}} could be a bound, I suppose on a one point set?</ref>
 +
{{anchor|unbounded}}If a set is not bounded it is "''[[unbounded]]''" (that link redirects to this line)
 +
==[[Equivalent conditions to a set being bounded|Equivalent conditions]]==
 +
{{:Equivalent conditions to a set being bounded/Statement}}
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Diameter (set)]]
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references group="Note"/>
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
{{Definition|Metric Space|Functional Analysis|Analysis}}
 +
=OLD PAGE=
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
{{Todo|Surely this can be generalised to an arbitrary [[Metric space]]}}
 
{{Todo|Surely this can be generalised to an arbitrary [[Metric space]]}}

Latest revision as of 23:31, 29 October 2016

Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Needs fleshing out
Grade: A
This page is currently being refactored (along with many others)
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. It just means the page doesn't conform to the style of the site (usually due to age) or a better way of presenting the information has been discovered.
The message provided is:
I've found a definition!

Definition

Let [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath] be a metric space. Let [ilmath]A\in\mathcal{P}(X)[/ilmath] be an arbitrary subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]. Then we say "[ilmath]A[/ilmath] is bounded in [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath]" if[1]:

  • [ilmath]\exists C<\infty\ \forall a,b\in A[d(a,b)<C][/ilmath] - where [ilmath]C[/ilmath] is real[Note 1]

If a set is not bounded it is "unbounded" (that link redirects to this line)

Equivalent conditions

Let [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath] be a metric space and let [ilmath]A\in\mathcal{P}(X)[/ilmath] be an arbitrary subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]. Then the following are all logical equivalent to each other[Note 2]:

  1. [ilmath]\exists C<\infty\ \forall a,b\in A[d(a,b)<C][/ilmath] - [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is bounded (the definition)
  2. [ilmath]\forall x\in X\exists C<\infty\forall a\in A[d(a,x)<C][/ilmath][1]

See also

Notes

  1. [ilmath]C\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} [/ilmath] should do as [ilmath]0[/ilmath] could be a bound, I suppose on a one point set?
  2. Just in case the reader isn't sure what this means, if [ilmath]A[/ilmath] and [ilmath]B[/ilmath] are logically equivalent then:
    • [ilmath]A\iff B[/ilmath]. In words "[ilmath]A[/ilmath] if and only if [ilmath]B[/ilmath]"

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Functional Analysis - Volume 1: A gentle introduction - Dzung Minh Ha

OLD PAGE

Notes


TODO: Surely this can be generalised to an arbitrary Metric space



Of [ilmath]\mathbb{R}^n[/ilmath]

Given a set [ilmath]A\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n[/ilmath] we say [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is bounded[1] if:

  • [ilmath]\exists K\in\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] such that [ilmath]\forall x\in A[/ilmath] (where [ilmath]x=(x_1,\cdots,x_n)[/ilmath]) we have [ilmath]\vert x_i\vert\le K[/ilmath] for [ilmath]i\in\{1,\cdots,n\} [/ilmath]

Immediate results

(Real line) [ilmath]A\subseteq[-K,K]\subset\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] (where [ilmath]K> 0[/ilmath] and [ilmath][-K,K][/ilmath] denotes a closed interval) if and only if [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is bounded.


This follows right from the definitions, the [ilmath]K[/ilmath] is the bound.

Proof: [ilmath]\implies[/ilmath]

If such a [ilmath]K[/ilmath] exists then it is the bound. We are done.

Proof: [ilmath]\impliedby[/ilmath]

If it is bounded then it is easy to see that given a bound [ilmath]K[/ilmath], [ilmath]A\subseteq[-K,K][/ilmath] (use the implies-subset relation)


Note:[1] stipuates the [ilmath]A\subseteq[-K,K]\implies[/ilmath] bounded direction only.

(Real line) Every closed interval ([ilmath][a,b][/ilmath] for [ilmath]a,b\in\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] and [ilmath]a\le b[/ilmath]) is bounded.[1]


Choose [ilmath]K=\text{Max}(\vert a\vert,\vert b\vert)[/ilmath] - result follows


See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Introduction to topology - Bert Mendelson - Third Edition