Not to be confused with Sequential compactness
There are two views here.
- Compactness is a topological property and we cannot say a set is compact, we say it is compact and implicitly consider it with the subspace topology
- We can say "sure that set is compact".
The difference comes into play when we cover a set (take the interval [0,5]⊂R) with open sets. Suppose we have the covering {(−1,3),(2,6)} this is already finite and covers the interval. The corresponding sets in the subspace topology are {[0,3),(2,5]} which are both open in the subspace topology.
Definition
A topological space is compact if every open cover (often denoted A
) of X
contains a finite sub-collection that also covers X
Lemma for a set being compact
Take a set Y⊂X
in a topological space (X,J)
.
To say Y
is compact is for Y
to be compact when considered as a subspace of (X,J)
That is to say that Y
is compact if and only if every covering of Y
by sets open in X
contains a finite subcovering covering Y
[Expand]
Theorem: A set Y⊆X is a compact space (considered with the subspace topology) of (X,J) if and only if every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcovering.
(Y,Jsubspace) is compact ⟹ every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcovering
- Suppose that the space (Y,Jsubspace)
is compact and that A={Aα}α∈I
(where each Aα∈J
- that is each set is open in X
) is an open covering (which is to say Y⊆∪α∈IAα)
- Then the collection {Aα∩Y|α∈I}
is a covering of Y
by sets open in Y
(by definition of being a subspace)
- By hypothesis Y
is compact, hence a finite sub-collection {Aαi∩Y}ni=1
covers Y
(as to be compact every open cover must have a finite subcover)
- Then {Aαi}ni=1
is a sub-collection of A
that covers Y
.
Proof of details
- As The intersection of sets is a subset of each set and ∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)=Y
we see
- x∈∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⟹∃k∈N with 1≤k≤n:x∈Aαk∩Y
⟹x∈Aαk⟹x∈∪ni=1Aαi
- The important part being x∈∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⟹x∈∪ni=1Aαi
- then by the implies and subset relation we have Y=∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⊂∪ni=1Aαi
and conclude Y⊂∪ni=1Aαi
- Warning: this next bit looks funny - do not count on!
- Lastly, as A
was a covering ∪α∈IAα=Y
.
- It is clear that x∈∪ni=1Aαi⟹x∈∪α∈IAα
so again implies and subset relation we have:
- ∪ni=1Aαi⊂∪α∈IAα=Y
thus concluding ∪ni=1Aαi⊂Y
- Combining Y⊂∪ni=1Aαi
and ∪ni=1Aαi⊂Y
we see ∪ni=1Aαi=Y
- Thus {Aαi}ni=1
is a finite covering of Y
consisting of open sets from X
(Y,Jsubspace) is compact ⟸
every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcovering
- Suppose that every covering of Y
by sets open in X
contains a finite subcollection covering Y
. We need to show Y
is compact.
- Suppose we have a covering, A′={A′α}α∈I
of Y
by sets open in Y
- For each α
choose an open set Aα
open in X
such that: A′α=Aα∩Y
- Then the collection A={Aα}α∈I
covers Y
- By hypothesis we have a finite sub-collection from A of things open in X
that cover Y
- Thus the corresponding finite subcollection of A′
covers Y