Notes:An introduction to manifolds - Loring W. Tu

From Maths
Revision as of 16:59, 30 November 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Saving work)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Chapter 1

Section 1: Smooth functions on Euclidean space

1.1: C^\infty vs Analytic functions

Example:A smooth function that is not real analytic

1.2: Taylor's theorem with remainder

Section 2: Tangent vectors in \mathbb{R}^n as Derivations

  • D_vf\eq\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\left(\frac{f(c(t))-f(p)}{t}\right)\eq\frac{d}{dt}f(c(t))\Big\vert_{t\eq 0}

Section 3: The exterior algebra of multicovectors

3.3: Multilinear functions

  • k-linear function. A multilinear function: f:V^k\rightarrow\mathbb{R} .
  • Future: Permutation action: Let f be k-linear and let \sigma\in S_k - the symmetric group on k symbols. Then:
    • (\sigma f)(v_1,\ldots,v_k):\eq f(v_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,v_{\sigma(k)})
  • Symmetric: \forall\sigma\in S_k[\sigma f\eq f]
  • Alternating: \forall\sigma\in S_k[\sigma f\eq\text{Sign}(\sigma)f]
Notations
  • L_k(V) - all k-linear functions
  • A_k(V) - all alternating k-linear functions.

Lemma 3.11:

  • If \sigma,\tau\in S_k and f is k-linear then:
    • \tau(\sigma f)\eq(\tau\sigma)f

3.5: The symmetrising and alternating operators

Let f\in L_k(V), then:

  • Sf:\eq \sum_{\sigma \in S_k} \sigma f
  • Af:\eq \sum_{\sigma \in S_k} \text{Sign}(\sigma)\sigma f

Lemma 3.14:

  • If f\in L_k(V) is an alternating k-linear function already then:
    • Af\eq (k!)f

3.6: The tensor product

Let f\in L_k(V) and g\in L_\ell(V), then their tensor product is a (k+\ell)-linear function, f\otimes g defined as follows:

    • (f\otimes g)(v_1,\ldots,v_{k+\ell}):\eq f(v_1,\ldots,v_k)g(v_{k+1},\ldots,v_{k+\ell})

3.7: The wedge product

Let f\in A_k(V) and g\in A_\ell(V), the wedge product is a product that is alternating also:

  • f\wedge g:\eq \frac{1}{k!\ell !}A(f\otimes g), or explicitly:
  • f\wedge g(v_1,\ldots,v_{k+\ell})\eq\frac{1}{k!\ell!}\sum_{\sigma\in S_{k+\ell} } \text{Sign}(\sigma)f(v_{\sigma(1)},\ldots, v_{\sigma(k)})g(v_{\sigma(k+1)},\ldots,v_{\sigma(k+\ell)})

This is obviously alternating.


Suppose that f(v_1,v_2)g(\text{whatever}) is a term, then so is -f(v_2,v_1)g(\text{whatever}) say too.

Remember f is alternating by definition, that means:

  • f(v_2,v_1)\eq -f(v_1,v_2)

So we really have 2f(v_1,v_2)g(\text{whatever}) in the term. There are a lot of redundancies.

Definition:

  • A permutation, \sigma\in S_{k+\ell} is a (k,\ell)-shuffle if:
    • \sigma(1)<\sigma(2)<\cdots<\sigma(k-1)<\sigma(k) and \sigma(k+1)<\sigma(k+2)<\cdots<\sigma(k+\ell-1)<\sigma(k+\ell)

Now we may re-write f\wedge g as:

  • (f\wedge g)\eq\sum_{\sigma\ :\ (k,\ell)\text{-shuffle} } \text{Sign}(\sigma)f(v_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,v_{\sigma(k)})g(v_{\sigma(k+1)},\ldots,v_{\sigma(k+\ell)})

Caveat:All of this is VERY informal... there needs to be proof.... but I'll go along