Ring

From Maths
Revision as of 12:46, 18 March 2015 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "Not to be confused with rings of sets which are a topic of algebras of sets and thus Algebras}} and Sigma-ring...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Not to be confused with rings of sets which are a topic of algebras of sets and thus σ-Algebras and σ-rings


Definition

A set R and two binary operations + and × such that the following hold:

Rule Formal Explanation
Addition is commutative a,bR[a+b=b+a]
It doesn't matter what order we add
Addition is associative a,b,cR[(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)]
Now writing a+b+c isn't ambiguous
Additive identity eRxR[e+x=x+e=x]
We do not prove it is unique (after which it is usually denoted 0), just "it exists"

The "exists e forall xR" is important, there exists a single e that always works

Additive inverse xRyR[x+y=y+x=e]
We do not prove it is unique (after we do it is usually denoted x, just that it exists

The "forall xR there exists" states that for a given xR a y exists. Not a y exists for all x

Multiplication is associative a,b,cR[(ab)c=a(bc)]
Multiplication is distributive a,b,cR[a(b+c)=ab+ac]

a,b,cR[(a+b)c=ac+bc]

Some books introduce rings first, I do not know why. A ring is an additive group (it is commutative making it an Abelian one at that), that is a ring is just a group (G,+) with another operation on G called ×