Satisfiable formula
From Maths
Revision as of 11:00, 11 September 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=A|msg=Needs fleshing out, other references. Created mainly to save me sifting through notes or scouring PDFs}} __TOC__ ==Definition== Let {{M|\mathscr{L} }}...")
Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Needs fleshing out, other references. Created mainly to save me sifting through notes or scouring PDFs
Contents
[hide]Definition
Let L be a first order language. Let A∈LF be a formula of L and let Γ⊆LF be a collection of formulas of L. If (M,σ) is a model of L such that[1]:
- AM[σ]=T (where T represents "true" as an element of set of truth values and AM[σ] represents the semantics of the formula A)[Note 1]
Then the formula, A, is said to be satisfiable under the model (M,σ)[1], or the model (M,σ) satisfies A[1], or that A is satisfiable if the model is understood[1]; we denote this by:
- M⊨σA, if A is a sentence then we may write just: M⊨A
If for every formula, B, in the collection Γ of formulas of L under the model (M,σ) we have M⊨σB then[1]:
- We may say the formula set Γ is satisfiable under the model (M,σ)[1], the model (M,σ) satisfies Γ[1] or Γ is satisfiable if the model is understood[1], we denote this:
- M⊨σΓ, if though every formula in Γ is a sentence then we may write: M⊨Γ
See next
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Recall that we use ≐ for equality in the FOL, here we mean equals as in "LHS evaluates to the same thing as the RHS in the meta-language"