Disjoint union topology

From Maths
Revision as of 12:39, 9 May 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=A|msg=Grade A until it is more presentable.}} ==Definition== Suppose {{M|\big((X_\alpha,\mathcal{J}_\alpha)\big)_{\alpha\in I} }} be an indexed family of t...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Grade A until it is more presentable.

Definition

Suppose ((Xα,Jα))αI be an indexed family of topological spaces that are non-empty[1], the disjoint union topology is a topological space:

  • with underlying set αIXα, this is the disjoint union of sets, recall (x,β)αIXαβIxXβ and
  • The topology where UP(αIXα) is considered open if and only if αI[XαUJα][Note 1] - be sure to notice the abuse of notation going on here.

TODO: Flesh out notes, mention subspace Xα×{α} and such



Notes

  1. Jump up There's a very nasty abuse of notation going on here. First, note a set U is going to be a bunch of points of the form (x,γ) for various xs and γs (I). There is no "canonical projection" FROM the product to the spaces, as this would not be a function!

References

  1. Jump up Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee



TODO: Investigate the need to be non-empty, I suspect it's because the union "collapses" in this case, and the space wouldn't be a part of union