Notes:Quotient topology
Note to readers: the page quotient topology as it stands right now (Wednesday, 16/Jul/2025 at 02:52) is an embarrassment to me. However before I can clean it up I must unify it. I've been using it for almost 2 years now though I promise! Gosh this is embarrassing.
According to John M. Lee
Let \sim denote an equivalence relation, let (X,\mathcal{J}) be a topological space. We get a map, \pi:X\rightarrow\frac{X}{\sim} that takes \pi:x\rightarrow[x]
- The quotient topology on \frac{X}{\sim} is the finest such that \pi is continuous
Let \mathcal{K} denote a topology on \frac{X}{\sim} , then we may define \mathcal{K} as:
- \mathcal{K}:=\{U\in\mathcal{P}(\frac{X}{\sim})\ \vert\ \pi^{-1}(U)\in\mathcal{J} \}, that is:
- U\in\mathcal{P}(\frac{X}{\sim}) is open if \pi^{-1}(U) is open in X - we get "only if" by going the other way. I must make a page about how definitions are "iff"s
Note: more than one book is very clear on "U\in\mathcal{P}(\frac{X}{\sim}) is open in \frac{X}{\sim} if and only if \pi^{-1}(U)\in\mathcal{J} , not sure why they stress it so.
Quotient map
A map between two topological spaces (X,\mathcal{J}) and (Y,\mathcal{K}) is a quotient map if:
- It is surjective
- The topology on Y (\mathcal{K} ) is the quotient topology that'd be induced on Y by the map q
Lee actually defines the quotient topology using maps first, then constructs the equiv relation version, but we can can define an equivalence relation as follows:
- x\sim y\iff q(x)=q(y) and that's where this comes from
Passing to the quotient
Passing to the quotient |
---|
- Let X and Z be topological spaces,
- let q:X\rightarrow Y be a quotient map,
- let f:X\rightarrow Z be any continuous mapping such that q(x)=q(y)\implies f(x)=f(y)
Then
- There exists a unique continuous map, \bar{f}:Y\rightarrow Z such that f=\bar{f}\circ q