< Limit (sequence)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The idea is that defining "tends towards x
" is rather difficult, to sidestep this we just say "we can get as close as we like to" instead. This is the purpose of ϵ
.
We say that "if you give me an ϵ>0

- as small as you like - I can find you a point of the sequence (N
) where all points after are within ϵ
of x
(where d(⋅,⋅)




is our notion of distance)
- That is after N
in the sequence, so that's xn+1,xn+1,…









the distance between xN+i


and x
is <ϵ
- This is exactly what n>N⟹d(xn,x)<ϵ












says, it says that:
- whenever n>N


we must have d(xn,x)<ϵ








As per the nature of implies we may have d(xn,x)<ϵ







without n>N

, it is only important that WHENEVER we are beyond N
in the sequence that d(xn,x)<ϵ







Example
|
|
Here:
- x
-axis scale is from 0 to 12.6   , marks are shown every unit.
- y
-axis scale starts from 0 and is marked every 0.25   units.
- The sequence is any sequence of points on the wavy function shown.
- The limit of this is clearly 1

- The two horizontal lines show 1−ϵ
  and 1+ϵ  
- The vertical line shows one possible value where every point after it is within ϵ
of 1
- due to technical limitations the function f(x)=1+sin(πx)14x2
                 is shown
- The curves are bounds on the function.
|
Notice that at x=1

that , in fact the curve is within ±ϵ
several times before we reach the vertical line, this is the significance of the implies sign, when we write A⟹B

we require that whenever A
is true, B
must be true, but B
may be true regardless of what A
is.
Note that after the vertical line the function is always within the bounds.
Because of this any N′>N


may be used too, as if n>N′


and N′>N


then n>N′>N




so n>N

- this proves that if N
works then any larger N′
will too. There is no requirement to find the smallest N
that'll work, just an N
such that n>N⟹d(xn,x)<ϵ










