Dynkin system/Proof that definitions 1 and 2 are equivalent
From Maths
< Dynkin system
Revision as of 05:09, 22 August 2015 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Extra Maths}}<noinclude> ==Claim== The following definitions are the same: {| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! Definition 1 ! Definition 2 |- | {{:Dynkin system/Definition...")
Contents
[hide]Claim
The following definitions are the same:
Definition 1 | Definition 2 |
---|---|
Given a set X and a family of subsets of X, which we shall denote D⊆P(X) is a Dynkin system[1] if:
|
Given a set X and a family of subsets of X we denote D⊆P(X) is a Dynkin system[2] on X if: |
Proof
TODO: Flesh out the algebra (blue boxes)
Definition 1 ⟹ definition 2
- Let D be a subgroup satisfying definition 1, then I claim it satisfies definition 2. Let us check the conditions.
- X∈D is satisfied by definition
- For A,B∈D with B⊆A then A−B∈D
- Note that A−B=(Ac∪⋅B)c (this is not true in general, it requires B⊆AInclude ven diagram
- As by hypothesis D is closed under complements and disjoint unions, we see that (Ac∪⋅B)c∈D thus
- we have A−B∈D
- Given (An)∞n=1⊆D being an increasing sequence of subsets, we have limn→∞(An)=A where A:=⋃∞n=1An (See limit of an increasing sequence of sets for more information)
- Let (An)∞n=1⊆D be given.
- Define a new sequence of sets, (Bn)∞n=1 by:
- B1=A1
- Bn=An−Bn−1
- This is a pairwise disjoint sequence of sets.
- Now by hypothesis ⋃⋅∞n=1Bn∈D
- Note that ⋃⋅∞n=1Bn=∞⋃n=1An
- So we have ⋃∞n=1An∈D:=A, thus the limit is in D - as required.
This completes the first half of the proof.
The second half isn't tricky, the only bit I recommend knowing is A∪⋅B=(Ac−B)c
TODO: That second half
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Recall this means An⊆An+1
References
- Jump up ↑ Measures, Integrals and Martingales - René L. Schilling
- Jump up ↑ Probability and Stochastics - Erhan Cinlar