Difference between revisions of "Passing to the quotient (topology)/Statement"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Updating, moving things about.)
m (Formatting issue fixed)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{Requires references|grade=A}}
 
{{Requires references|grade=A}}
 
==Statement==
 
==Statement==
</noinclude><div style="float:right;margin-left:0.05em;">
+
</noinclude><div style="float:right;margin-left:0.05em;overflow:hidden;">
 
{| style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;" class="wikitable" border="1"
 
{| style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;" class="wikitable" border="1"
 
|-
 
|-

Latest revision as of 20:23, 11 October 2016


Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.
Grade: A
This page requires references, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable, it just means that the author of the page doesn't have a book to hand, or remember the book to find it, which would have been a suitable reference.

Statement

f descends to the quotient

Suppose that (X,J) is a topological space and is an equivalence relation, let (X,Q) be the resulting quotient topology and π:XX the resulting quotient map, then:

  • Let (Y,K) be any topological space and let f:XY be a continuous map that is constant on the fibres of π[Note 1] then:
  • there exists a unique continuous map, ˉf:XY such that f=¯fπ

We may then say f descends to the quotient or passes to the quotient

Note: this is an instance of passing-to-the-quotient for functions

Notes

  1. Jump up That means that:

References