Difference between revisions of "Factoring a function through the projection of an equivalence relation induced by that function yields an injection"
From Maths
m (Reference, proof note) |
m |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} | * {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} | ||
Furthermore, if {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is [[surjective]] then {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is not only [[injective]] but [[surjective]] to, that is: {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is a [[bijection]]<ref group="Note">See "''[[If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection]]''" for details</ref>. | Furthermore, if {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is [[surjective]] then {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is not only [[injective]] but [[surjective]] to, that is: {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is a [[bijection]]<ref group="Note">See "''[[If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection]]''" for details</ref>. | ||
− | <div style="clear:both;"></div> | + | <!--<div style="clear:both;"></div>--> |
+ | ==Applications== | ||
+ | Topology: | ||
+ | * [[Factoring a continuous map through the projection of an equivalence relation induced by that map yields an injective continuous map|If {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is a continuous map then factoring it through the projection of the equivalence relation it induces yields a continuous injection]] - topological version of this theorem almost exactly. We can extend this slightly in the case {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is [[surjective]]: | ||
+ | ** [[If a surjective continuous map is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that map then the yielded map is a continuous bijection|If {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is continuous ''and'' surjective then factoring it through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation it induces yields a continuous bijection]] - this is an extension of the previous statement, recall that when we take a surjection and apply {{link|passing-to-the-quotient|function}} we get surjection, we know from above it's injective. So now it's [[bijective]] | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
{{Requires proof|grade=A*|msg=Do this now, just saving work}} | {{Requires proof|grade=A*|msg=Do this now, just saving work}} | ||
− | * Note to self - uniqueness comes from that we're [[factor (function)|factoring]] through a [[surjective]] map (namely, {{M|\pi}}), we only really have to show the result is injective. | + | * Note to self - uniqueness comes from that we're [[factor (function)|factoring]] through a [[surjective]] map (namely, {{M|\pi}}), we only really have to show the result is injective.-->Outline of proof method |
+ | # We must check the set up satisfies the requirements of the {{link|passing-to-the-quotient|function}} theorem (to yield {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}}). | ||
+ | # We apply the theorem to get {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}}. | ||
+ | # Next we must show {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is [[injective]] | ||
+ | ===Proof body=== | ||
+ | {{Requires proof|grade=D|msg=Part 3 was the only non-trivial part. It is obvious that we can factor {{M|f}} through {{M|\pi}}, in fact: | ||
+ | * To do so requires that "{{M|f}} be constant on the {{plural|fibre|s}} of {{M|\pi}}", ie: | ||
+ | ** {{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[\pi(x)=\pi(y)\implies f(x)=f(y)]}} (see [[Equivalent conditions to being constant on the fibres of a map]]) | ||
+ | *** But if {{M|1=\pi(x)=\pi(y)}} then {{M|x\sim y}} and by definition {{M|1=x\sim y\iff f(x)=f(y)}}! Trivial! | ||
+ | Oh just FYI there's a commented out note and a requires-proof template at the top of the {{C|1===proof==}} heading, remove that later!}} | ||
+ | ====Step 3==== | ||
+ | We wish to show that {{M|\tilde{f}:\frac{X}{\sim}\rightarrow Y}} is [[injective]], ie: {{M|1=\forall a,b\in\frac{X}{\sim}[\tilde{f}(a)=\tilde{f}(b)\implies a=b]}} | ||
+ | * Let {{M|a,b\in\frac{X}{\sim} }} be given. | ||
+ | ** Suppose {{M|1=\tilde{f}(a)\ne\tilde{f}(b)}} then by the nature of [[logical implication]] we do not care whether or not {{M|1=a=b}}, either way it is true, we're done in this case. | ||
+ | ** Suppose {{M|1=\tilde{f}(a)=\tilde{f}(b)}}, by the nature of logical implication we now require this leads to {{M|1=a=b}} | ||
+ | *** By the [[surjectivity]] of {{M|\pi:X\rightarrow\frac{X}{\sim} }} we see: | ||
+ | **** {{M|1=\exists x\in X[\pi(x)=a]}} and {{M|1=\exists y\in X[\pi(y)=b]}} | ||
+ | ***** Note that {{M|1=\tilde{f}(a)=\tilde{f}(\pi(x))}} and {{M|1=\tilde{f}(b)=\tilde{f}(\pi(y))}}, also by assumption we have {{M|1=\tilde{f}(a)=\tilde{f}(\pi(x))= \tilde{f}(\pi(y))=\tilde{f}(b)}} | ||
+ | ***** Notice also that {{M|1=f(x)=\tilde{f}(\pi(x))}} and {{M|1=f(y)=\tilde{f}(\pi(y))}} (this is the whole point of {{M|\tilde{f} }}) | ||
+ | ****** So we see {{M|1=f(x)=\tilde{f}(a)=\tilde{f}(\pi(x))= \tilde{f}(\pi(y))=\tilde{f}(b)=f(y)}}, or importantly: | ||
+ | ******* {{M|1=f(x)=f(y)}} | ||
+ | ****** Recall that {{M|1=x\sim y\iff f(x)=f(y)}}, so now we know {{M|x\sim y}} | ||
+ | ***** An elementary property of {{M|\pi:X\rightarrow\frac{X}{\sim} }} is that if {{M|x\sim y}} then {{M|1=\pi(x)=\pi(y)}}<ref group="Note">{{Todo|Link to statement, this ought to be mentioned somewhere explicit on this site!}}</ref><ref group="Note">{{Todo|This can be strengthened to {{M|\iff}} surely!}}</ref> | ||
+ | ****** Explicitly, notice we have: {{M|1=\pi(x)=\pi(y)}} | ||
+ | ***** Recall that {{M|1=a=\pi(x)}} and {{M|1=b=\pi(y)}} by definition of {{M|x}} and {{M|y}}, so: | ||
+ | ****** {{M|1=a=\pi(x)=\pi(y)=b}} or more simply: {{M|1=a=b}} | ||
+ | *** We have shown that supposing {{M|1=f(a)=f(b)}} is given then {{M|1=a=b}} | ||
+ | ** Both cases have been evaluated and the implication holds for both | ||
+ | * Since {{M|a,b\in\frac{X}{\sim} }} were arbitrary we have shown this for all {{M|a,b\in\frac{X}{\sim} }} | ||
+ | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection]] | * [[If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection]] | ||
+ | * [[Factoring a continuous map through the projection of an equivalence relation induced by that map yields an injective continuous map]] | ||
+ | ** [[If a surjective continuous map is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that map then the yielded map is a continuous bijection]] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references group="Note"/> | <references group="Note"/> |
Latest revision as of 20:24, 9 October 2016
Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Flesh out and demote
Contents
[hide]Statement
Let X and Y be sets, let f:X→Y be any function between them, and let ∼⊆X×X denote the equivalence relation induced by the function f, recall that means:- ∀x,x′∈X[x∼x′⟺f(x)=f(x′)]
Then we claim we can factor[Note 1] f:X→Y through π:X→X∼[Note 2] to yield a unique injective map[1]:
- ˜f:X∼→Y
Furthermore, if f:X→Y is surjective then ˜f:X∼→Y is not only injective but surjective to, that is: ˜f:X∼→Y is a bijection[Note 3].
Applications
Topology:
- If f:X→Y is a continuous map then factoring it through the projection of the equivalence relation it induces yields a continuous injection - topological version of this theorem almost exactly. We can extend this slightly in the case f:X→Y is surjective:
- If f:X→Y is continuous and surjective then factoring it through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation it induces yields a continuous bijection - this is an extension of the previous statement, recall that when we take a surjection and apply passing-to-the-quotient we get surjection, we know from above it's injective. So now it's bijective
Proof
Outline of proof method
- We must check the set up satisfies the requirements of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem (to yield ˜f:X∼→Y).
- We apply the theorem to get ˜f:X∼→Y.
- Next we must show ˜f:X∼→Y is injective
Proof body
Grade: D
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
The message provided is:
Part 3 was the only non-trivial part. It is obvious that we can factor f through π, in fact:
- To do so requires that "f be constant on the fibres of π", ie:
- ∀x,y∈X[π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)] (see Equivalent conditions to being constant on the fibres of a map)
- But if π(x)=π(y) then x∼y and by definition x∼y⟺f(x)=f(y)! Trivial!
- ∀x,y∈X[π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)] (see Equivalent conditions to being constant on the fibres of a map)
Step 3
We wish to show that ˜f:X∼→Y is injective, ie: ∀a,b∈X∼[˜f(a)=˜f(b)⟹a=b]
- Let a,b∈X∼ be given.
- Suppose ˜f(a)≠˜f(b) then by the nature of logical implication we do not care whether or not a=b, either way it is true, we're done in this case.
- Suppose ˜f(a)=˜f(b), by the nature of logical implication we now require this leads to a=b
- By the surjectivity of π:X→X∼ we see:
- ∃x∈X[π(x)=a] and ∃y∈X[π(y)=b]
- Note that ˜f(a)=˜f(π(x)) and ˜f(b)=˜f(π(y)), also by assumption we have ˜f(a)=˜f(π(x))=˜f(π(y))=˜f(b)
- Notice also that f(x)=˜f(π(x)) and f(y)=˜f(π(y)) (this is the whole point of ˜f)
- So we see f(x)=˜f(a)=˜f(π(x))=˜f(π(y))=˜f(b)=f(y), or importantly:
- f(x)=f(y)
- Recall that x∼y⟺f(x)=f(y), so now we know x∼y
- So we see f(x)=˜f(a)=˜f(π(x))=˜f(π(y))=˜f(b)=f(y), or importantly:
- An elementary property of π:X→X∼ is that if x∼y then π(x)=π(y)[Note 4][Note 5]
- Explicitly, notice we have: π(x)=π(y)
- Recall that a=π(x) and b=π(y) by definition of x and y, so:
- a=π(x)=π(y)=b or more simply: a=b
- ∃x∈X[π(x)=a] and ∃y∈X[π(y)=b]
- We have shown that supposing f(a)=f(b) is given then a=b
- By the surjectivity of π:X→X∼ we see:
- Both cases have been evaluated and the implication holds for both
- Since a,b∈X∼ were arbitrary we have shown this for all a,b∈X∼
See also
- If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection
- Factoring a continuous map through the projection of an equivalence relation induced by that map yields an injective continuous map
Notes
- Jump up ↑ AKA: passing to the quotient
- Jump up ↑ the canonical projection of the equivalence relation, given by π:x↦[x] where [x] denotes the equivalence class containing x
- Jump up ↑ See "If a surjective function is factored through the canonical projection of the equivalence relation induced by that function then the yielded function is a bijection" for details
- Jump up ↑
TODO: Link to statement, this ought to be mentioned somewhere explicit on this site!
- Jump up ↑
TODO: This can be strengthened to ⟺ surely!
References
Categories:
- Todo
- Stub pages
- Pages requiring proofs
- Theorems
- Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Elementary Set Theory Theorems
- Elementary Set Theory Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Elementary Set Theory
- Abstract Algebra Theorems
- Abstract Algebra Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Abstract Algebra
- Set Theory Theorems
- Set Theory Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Set Theory