Difference between revisions of "Equivalent conditions for a linear map between two normed spaces to be continuous everywhere/1 implies 2"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 48: Line 48:
 
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} } }}
 
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} } }}
 
:** It is easy to see that {{M|b_k\rightarrow +\infty}} (as {{M|(x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0}})  
 
:** It is easy to see that {{M|b_k\rightarrow +\infty}} (as {{M|(x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0}})  
 +
{{Todo|Prove that this tends to {{M|+\infty}}}}
 
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p) }}
 
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p) }}
{{Todo|How does {{M|d_k\rightarrow 0\in X}}? Use the metric induced by the {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert_Y}}?}}
+
{{Begin Notebox}}
:* Clearly {{MM|1=\Vert d_k\Vert_X=b_k\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X=\frac{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} } }} {{MM|1= =\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} \rightarrow 0}}
+
:* Clearly {{MM|1=d_k\rightarrow 0}}
 +
{{Begin Notebox Content}}
 +
If {{M|1=(d_k)_{k=1}^\infty\rightarrow 0}} then {{M|\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}\forall n\in\mathbb{N}[n>N\implies\Vert d_k-0\Vert_X<\epsilon]}}.
 +
* Notice {{MM|1=\Vert d_k\Vert_X=b_k\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X=\frac{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} } }} {{MM|1= =\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} }}
 +
{{Todo|Finish this proof}}
 +
{{End Notebox Content}}{{End Notebox}}
 
:* But {{MM|1=\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty}}
 
:* But {{MM|1=\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty}}
 
* Thus we have shown if {{M|L}} is not continuous at {{M|p}} that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the [[contrapositive]] of what we set out to claim
 
* Thus we have shown if {{M|L}} is not continuous at {{M|p}} that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the [[contrapositive]] of what we set out to claim
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
 +
{{Todo|At the bottom, explain how {{M|\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y}} being unbounded related to {{M|L(d_k)}}}}
 
{{Theorem Of|Linear Algebra|Functional Analysis}}
 
{{Theorem Of|Linear Algebra|Functional Analysis}}
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 02:24, 28 February 2016

(Unknown grade)
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Needs some finishing off with the conclusion

Statement

Given two normed spaces (X,X) and (Y,Y) and also a linear map L:XY then we have:

  • If L maps a sequence, (xn)n=10 (a null sequence) to a bounded sequence then
  • L is continuous at some pX

Proof

This is a proof by contrapositive. That is we will show that if L is not continuous at p L takes a null sequence to one that isn't bounded (an unbounded one).

  • Let the normed spaces X and Y be given, as well as a linear map L:XY
    • Suppose that L is not continuous at p, this means:
[Expand]
  • (xn)n=1p such that lim
  • Let us now take L(x_n)\not\rightarrow L(p) and subtract L(p) from both sides. We see:
    • L(x_n)-L(p)\not\rightarrow L(p)-L(p), using the fact that L is linear we see that:
      • L(x_n-p)\not\rightarrow L(0) and L(0)=0\in Y so:
    • L(x_n-p)\not\rightarrow 0
  • Thus \Vert L(x_n-p)\Vert_Y\not\rightarrow 0 (as \Vert0\Vert_Y=0 by definition)
[Expand]
  • So \exists C>0\ \forall N\in\mathbb{N}\ \exists n\in\mathbb{N}[n>N\wedge\Vert L(x_n-p)\Vert_Y>\epsilon]
  • Thus it is possible to construct a subsequence, (\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y)_{k=1}^\infty of the image (x_n) where for every k we have:
[Expand]
  • \Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y>C
  • We now have a sequence (x_{n_k}) such that \Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y>C
  • Define a new sequence b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} }
    • It is easy to see that b_k\rightarrow +\infty (as (x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0)

TODO: Prove that this tends to +\infty


  • Define a new sequence d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p)
[Expand]
  • Clearly d_k\rightarrow 0
  • But \Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty
  • Thus we have shown if L is not continuous at p that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the contrapositive of what we set out to claim



TODO: At the bottom, explain how \Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y being unbounded related to L(d_k)