Difference between revisions of "Equivalent conditions for a linear map between two normed spaces to be continuous everywhere/1 implies 2"
From Maths
m |
m |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} } }} | :* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} } }} | ||
:** It is easy to see that {{M|b_k\rightarrow +\infty}} (as {{M|(x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0}}) | :** It is easy to see that {{M|b_k\rightarrow +\infty}} (as {{M|(x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0}}) | ||
+ | {{Todo|Prove that this tends to {{M|+\infty}}}} | ||
:* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p) }} | :* Define a new sequence {{MM|1=d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p) }} | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Begin Notebox}} |
− | + | :* Clearly {{MM|1=d_k\rightarrow 0}} | |
+ | {{Begin Notebox Content}} | ||
+ | If {{M|1=(d_k)_{k=1}^\infty\rightarrow 0}} then {{M|\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}\forall n\in\mathbb{N}[n>N\implies\Vert d_k-0\Vert_X<\epsilon]}}. | ||
+ | * Notice {{MM|1=\Vert d_k\Vert_X=b_k\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X=\frac{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} } }} {{MM|1= =\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert_X} }} | ||
+ | {{Todo|Finish this proof}} | ||
+ | {{End Notebox Content}}{{End Notebox}} | ||
:* But {{MM|1=\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty}} | :* But {{MM|1=\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty}} | ||
* Thus we have shown if {{M|L}} is not continuous at {{M|p}} that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the [[contrapositive]] of what we set out to claim | * Thus we have shown if {{M|L}} is not continuous at {{M|p}} that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the [[contrapositive]] of what we set out to claim | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
+ | {{Todo|At the bottom, explain how {{M|\Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y}} being unbounded related to {{M|L(d_k)}}}} | ||
{{Theorem Of|Linear Algebra|Functional Analysis}} | {{Theorem Of|Linear Algebra|Functional Analysis}} | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 02:24, 28 February 2016
(Unknown grade)
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
The message provided is:
Needs some finishing off with the conclusion
Statement
Given two normed spaces (X,∥⋅∥X) and (Y,∥⋅∥Y) and also a linear map L:X→Y then we have:
- If L maps a sequence, (xn)∞n=1→0 (a null sequence) to a bounded sequence then
- L is continuous at some p∈X
Proof
This is a proof by contrapositive. That is we will show that if L is not continuous at p ⟹ L takes a null sequence to one that isn't bounded (an unbounded one).
- Let the normed spaces X and Y be given, as well as a linear map L:X→Y
- Suppose that L is not continuous at p, this means:
[Expand]
- ∃(xn)∞n=1→p such that lim
- Let us now take L(x_n)\not\rightarrow L(p) and subtract L(p) from both sides. We see:
- L(x_n)-L(p)\not\rightarrow L(p)-L(p), using the fact that L is linear we see that:
- L(x_n-p)\not\rightarrow L(0) and L(0)=0\in Y so:
- L(x_n-p)\not\rightarrow 0
- L(x_n)-L(p)\not\rightarrow L(p)-L(p), using the fact that L is linear we see that:
- Thus \Vert L(x_n-p)\Vert_Y\not\rightarrow 0 (as \Vert0\Vert_Y=0 by definition)
- Let us now take L(x_n)\not\rightarrow L(p) and subtract L(p) from both sides. We see:
[Expand]
- So \exists C>0\ \forall N\in\mathbb{N}\ \exists n\in\mathbb{N}[n>N\wedge\Vert L(x_n-p)\Vert_Y>\epsilon]
- Thus it is possible to construct a subsequence, (\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y)_{k=1}^\infty of the image (x_n) where for every k we have:
[Expand]
- \Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y>C
- We now have a sequence (x_{n_k}) such that \Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y>C
- Define a new sequence b_k:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Vert x_{n_k}-p\Vert} }
- It is easy to see that b_k\rightarrow +\infty (as (x_{n_k}-p)\rightarrow 0)
TODO: Prove that this tends to +\infty
- Define a new sequence d_k:=b_k(x_{n_k}-p)
[Expand]
- Clearly d_k\rightarrow 0
- But \Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y=\Vert L(b_k(x_{n_k}-p))\Vert_Y=b_k\Vert L(x_{n_k}-p)\Vert_Y\ge Cb_k\rightarrow +\infty
- Thus we have shown if L is not continuous at p that the mapping of a null sequence is unbounded, the contrapositive of what we set out to claim
TODO: At the bottom, explain how \Vert L(d_k)\Vert_Y being unbounded related to L(d_k)