Difference between revisions of "Poisson distribution"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 23: Line 23:
 
*** the first 2 terms are easy to give: {{M|e^{\lambda} }} and {{M|\lambda e^{-\lambda} }} respectively, after that we have {{M|\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2 e^{-\lambda} }} and so forth
 
*** the first 2 terms are easy to give: {{M|e^{\lambda} }} and {{M|\lambda e^{-\lambda} }} respectively, after that we have {{M|\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2 e^{-\lambda} }} and so forth
 
** for {{M|k\in\mathbb{N}_{\ge 0} }} we have: {{MM|\mathbb{P}[X\le k]\eq e^{-\lambda}\sum^k_{j\eq 0}\frac{1}{j!}\lambda^j}}
 
** for {{M|k\in\mathbb{N}_{\ge 0} }} we have: {{MM|\mathbb{P}[X\le k]\eq e^{-\lambda}\sum^k_{j\eq 0}\frac{1}{j!}\lambda^j}}
 
+
===[[/RV|As a formal random variable]]===
 +
{{/RV|home=true}}
 
==To add to page==
 
==To add to page==
 
* [[The sum of two random variables with Poisson distributions is a Poisson distribution itself]]
 
* [[The sum of two random variables with Poisson distributions is a Poisson distribution itself]]

Revision as of 15:19, 22 November 2017

Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
My informal derivation feels too formal, but isn't formal enough to be a formal one! Work in progress!
Poisson distribution
XPoi(λ)
λR0
(λ - the average rate of events per unit)
file.png
Definition
Type Discrete, over N0
p.m.f P[X=k]:=eλλkk!
c.d.f P[Xk]=eλki=0λik!
Characteristics
Expected value E[X]=λ
Variance Var(X)=λ

Definition

  • XPoisson(λ)
    • for kN0 we have: P[X=k]:=eλλkk!
      • the first 2 terms are easy to give: eλ and λeλ respectively, after that we have 12λ2eλ and so forth
    • for kN0 we have: P[Xk]=eλkj=01j!λj

As a formal random variable

Situation for our RV
Caveat:λ here is used to denote 2 things - the parameter to the Poisson distribution, and the restriction of the 1 dimensional Lebesgue measure to some region of interest.

There is no unique way to define a random variable, here is one way.

  • Let ([0,1], B([0,1]), λ) be a probability space - which itself could be viewed as a rectangular distribution's random variable
    • Let λR>0 be given, and let XPoi(λ)
      • Specifically consider (N0, P(N0)) as a sigma-algebra and X:[0,1]N0 by:
        • X:x{0if x[0,p1)1if x[p1,p2)kif x[pk,pk+1) for p1:=eλλ11! and pk:=pk1+eλλkk!

Giving the setup shown on the left.

To add to page

Mean

  • n=0n×P[X=n]=n=0[n×eλλnn!]=0+[eλn=1λn(n1)!]=eλλ[n=1λn1(n1)!]
    =λeλ[n=0λnn!]=λeλ[limn(nk=0λkk!)]
    • But! ex=limn(ni=0xii!)
    • So =λeλeλ
      • =λ

Derivation

Standard Poisson distribution:

  • Let S:=[0,1)R, recall that means S={xR | 0x<1}
  • Let λ be the average count of some event that can occur 0 or more times on S

We will now divide S up into N equally sized chunks, for NN1

  • Let Si,N:=[i1N,iN)[Note 1] for i{1,,N}N

We will now define a random variable that counts the occurrences of events per interval.

  • Let C(Si,N) be the RV such that its value is the number of times the event occurred in the [i1N,iN) interval

We now require:

  • limN(P[C(Si,N)2])=0 - such that:
    • as the Si,N get smaller the chance of 2 or more events occurring in the space reaches zero.
    • Warning:This is phrased as a limit, I'm not sure it should be as we don't have any Si, so no BORV(λN) distribution then either

Note that:

  • limN(C(Si,N))=limN(BORV(λN))
    • This is supposed to convey that the distribution of C(Si,N) as N gets large gets arbitrarily close to BORV(λN)

So we may say for sufficiently large N that:

  • C(Si,N)(approx)BORV(λN), so that:
    • P[C(Si,N)=0](1λN)
    • P[C(Si,N)=1]λN, and of course
    • P[C(Si,N)2]0

Assuming the C(Si,N) are independent over i (which surely we get from the BORV distributions?) we see:

  • C(S)(approx)Bin(N,λN) or, more specifically: C(S)=limN(Ni=1C(Si,N))=limN(Bin(N,λN))


We see:

  • P[C(S)=k]=limN(P[Bin(N,λN)=k])=limN(NCk (λN)k(1λN)Nk)

We claim that:

  • limN(NCk (λN)k(1λN)Nk)=λkk!eλ

We will tackle this in two parts:

  • limN(NCk (λN)kA (1λN)NkB) where B\rightarrow e^{-\lambda} and A\rightarrow \frac{\lambda^k}{k!}

Proof

Key notes:

A

Notice:

  • {}^N\!C_k\ \left(\frac{\lambda}{N}\right)^k \eq \frac{N!}{(N-k)!k!}\cdot\frac{1}{N^k}\cdot\lambda^k
    \eq\frac{1}{k!}\cdot\frac{\overbrace{N(N-1)\cdots(N-k+2)(N-k+1)}^{k\text{ terms} } }{\underbrace{N\cdot N\cdots N}_{k\text{ times} } } \cdot\lambda^k
    • Notice that as N gets bigger N-k+1 is "basically" N so the Ns in the denominator cancel (in fact the value will be slightly less than 1, tending towards 1 as N\rightarrow\infty) this giving:
      • \frac{\lambda^k}{k!}

B

This comes from:

  • e^x:\eq\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\left(1+\frac{x}{n}\right)^n\right), so we get the e^{-\lambda} term.

Notes

  1. Jump up Recall again that means \{x\in\mathbb{R}\ \vert\ \frac{i-1}{N}\le x < \frac{i}{N} \}