Difference between revisions of "Notes:Covering spaces"
From Maths
(Saving work, easy stuff, worth doing proof) |
m (Saving work, minor amount though) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
#* Let {{M|p:E\rightarrow X}} be a covering map and let {{M|F:[0,1]\times[0,1]\rightarrow X}} be a [[homotopy]] (a continuous map in this case), then by the covering map: {{M|\exists e_0\in E[p(e_0)\eq F(0,0)]}} | #* Let {{M|p:E\rightarrow X}} be a covering map and let {{M|F:[0,1]\times[0,1]\rightarrow X}} be a [[homotopy]] (a continuous map in this case), then by the covering map: {{M|\exists e_0\in E[p(e_0)\eq F(0,0)]}} | ||
#** Then we claim there exists a unique lift of {{M|F}}, say {{M|G:[0,1]\times[0,1]\rightarrow E}} such that {{M|G(0,0)\eq e_0}} | #** Then we claim there exists a unique lift of {{M|F}}, say {{M|G:[0,1]\times[0,1]\rightarrow E}} such that {{M|G(0,0)\eq e_0}} | ||
+ | ==Proof== | ||
+ | ===Uniqueness of lifts=== | ||
+ | * We want to show {{M|\big(\exists y_0\in Y[g(y_0)\eq h(y_0)]\big)\implies g\eq h}}, to show {{M|g\eq h}} we must show: {{M|\forall y\in Y[g(y)\eq h(y)]}} |
Revision as of 17:21, 25 February 2017
Contents
[hide]Gamelin & Greene
- Evenly covered
- Let p:E→X be continuous map, we say U open in X is evenly covered by p if:
- p−1(U) equals a union of disjoint open sets of E such that each one of these disjoint open sets is homeomorphic onto U if you restrict p to it
- Let p:E→X be continuous map, we say U open in X is evenly covered by p if:
- Covering map
- p:E→X is a covering map if:
- p is surjective
- ∀x∈X∃U∈O(x,X)[U evenly covered by p]
- We say "E is a covering space of X"
- p:E→X is a covering map if:
Lift of a continuous map
Let p:E→X be a covering map, let (Y,K) be a topological space and let f:Y→X be a continuous map
- If there is a map: g:Y→E such that p∘g=f then g is called a lift of f
i.e. if the diagram on the right commutes
Claims
- Uniqueness of lifts
- Let p:E→X be a covering map, let Y be a connected topological space and let f:Y→X be a continuous map.
- Let g,h:Y→E be two lifts of f
- if ∃y∈Y[g(y)=h(y)] then g=y
- Let g,h:Y→E be two lifts of f
- Take some time to think about this, it's basically saying if they're lifts over the same part then they agree, the diagram above commuting has large implications
- Let p:E→X be a covering map, let Y be a connected topological space and let f:Y→X be a continuous map.
- Path lifting theorem
- Let p:E→X be a covering map, let γ∈C([0,1],X) (a path), then as p is a covering map ∃e0∈E[γ(0)=p(e0)], we claim:
- There is a unique path (or "lift" of γ): α:[0,1]→E such that α(0)=e0 and such that p∘α=γ
- Caveat:Note that if γ was a loop that α need not be a loop!
- Let p:E→X be a covering map, let γ∈C([0,1],X) (a path), then as p is a covering map ∃e0∈E[γ(0)=p(e0)], we claim:
- Path-homotopy lifting theorem (named by Alec)
- Let p:E→X be a covering map and let F:[0,1]×[0,1]→X be a homotopy (a continuous map in this case), then by the covering map: ∃e0∈E[p(e0)=F(0,0)]
- Then we claim there exists a unique lift of F, say G:[0,1]×[0,1]→E such that G(0,0)=e0
- Let p:E→X be a covering map and let F:[0,1]×[0,1]→X be a homotopy (a continuous map in this case), then by the covering map: ∃e0∈E[p(e0)=F(0,0)]
Proof
Uniqueness of lifts
- We want to show (∃y0∈Y[g(y0)=h(y0)])⟹g=h, to show g=h we must show: ∀y∈Y[g(y)=h(y)]