Difference between revisions of "The image of a compact set is compact"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=A|msg=Flesh out with references, proof is small but easy and can wait}} __TOC__ ==Statement== Let {{Top.|X|J}} and {{Top.|Y|K}} be topological spaces, le...")
 
(Added proof)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
{{Requires references|grade=A|I want Mendelson. Also should I make a note that considered as a subspace or compactness-as-a-subset are the same?}}
 
{{Requires references|grade=A|I want Mendelson. Also should I make a note that considered as a subspace or compactness-as-a-subset are the same?}}
 
==Proof==
 
==Proof==
{{Requires proof|grade=C|msg=Proof isn't that important as it is easy and routine.}}
+
* Let {{M|\mathcal{U} }} be an [[open cover]] of {{M|f(A)}} and then showing it has a finite subcover
 +
** The proof depends on {{M|\{f^{-1}(U)\ \vert\ U\in\mathcal{U} \} }} being an [[open cover]] of {{M|A}} by sets [[open set|open]] in {{Top.|X|J}}
 +
**# The open part comes from the {{M|U}} be [[open sets]], then by the definition of [[continuity]] {{M|f^{-1}(U)}} is open in {{M|X}} for each {{M|U\in\mathcal{U} }}
 +
**# We need to show {{MM|A\subseteq\bigcup_{U\in\mathcal{U} }f^{-1}(U)}}, by the [[implies-subset relation]] and then the definition of [[union]] we see:
 +
**#* {{MM|\left(A\subseteq\bigcup_{U\in\mathcal{U} }f^{-1}(U)\right)\iff\forall x\in A\left[x\in\bigcup_{U\in\mathcal{U} }f^{-1}(U)\right]}} {{MM|\iff\forall x\in A\exists U\in\mathcal{U}[x\in f^{-1}(U)]}}
 +
**#* In this case {{M|\{f^{-1}(U)\ \vert\ U\in\mathcal{U} \} }} is an [[open cover]] of {{M|A}}
 +
** Then we see, by [[compactness]] of {{M|A}}:
 +
*** there is some {{M|n\in\mathbb{N} }} such that {{M|\{f^{-1}(U_1),\ldots,f^{-1}(U_n)\} }}
 +
{{Requires proof|grade=C|msg=Proof isn't that important as it is easy and routine.
 +
* Done a chunk, but not finished. [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 17:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
{{Topology navbox|plain}}
 
{{Topology navbox|plain}}
 
{{Theorem Of|Topology}}
 
{{Theorem Of|Topology}}

Latest revision as of 17:20, 18 December 2016

Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Flesh out with references, proof is small but easy and can wait

Statement

Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces, let AP(X) be an arbitrary subset of X and let f:XY be a continuous map. Then:

  • if A is compact then f(A) is compact.
Grade: A
This page requires references, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable, it just means that the author of the page doesn't have a book to hand, or remember the book to find it, which would have been a suitable reference.
The message provided is:
I want Mendelson. Also should I make a note that considered as a subspace or compactness-as-a-subset are the same?

Proof

  • Let U be an open cover of f(A) and then showing it has a finite subcover
    • The proof depends on {f1(U) | UU} being an open cover of A by sets open in (X,J)
      1. The open part comes from the U be open sets, then by the definition of continuity f1(U) is open in X for each UU
      2. We need to show AUUf1(U)
        , by the implies-subset relation and then the definition of union we see:
        • (AUUf1(U))xA[xUUf1(U)]
          xAUU[xf1(U)]
        • In this case {f1(U) | UU} is an open cover of A
    • Then we see, by compactness of A:
      • there is some nN such that {f1(U1),,f1(Un)}
Grade: C
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Proof isn't that important as it is easy and routine.
  • Done a chunk, but not finished. Alec (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

References