Difference between revisions of "Exercises:Mond - Topology - 1"
(Created page with "__TOC__ ==Section A== ==Section B== Exercises 6, 7 and 8 make use of the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem ===Question 6=== {{/Question 6}} ==Section C== ==Notes== <references...") |
m |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Question 6=== | ===Question 6=== | ||
{{/Question 6}} | {{/Question 6}} | ||
+ | ===Question 7=== | ||
+ | {{/Question 7}} | ||
==Section C== | ==Section C== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== |
Revision as of 11:31, 8 October 2016
Contents
[hide]Section A
Section B
Exercises 6, 7 and 8 make use of the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem
Question 6
Part I
Find a surjective continuous mapping from [−1,1]⊂R to the unit circle, S1 such that it is injective except for that it sends −1 and 1 to the same point in S1. Definitions may be explicit or use a picture
Solution
We shall define f:[−1,1]→S1 to be such a map:- f:t↦(−sin(π(t+1))−cos(π(t+1))), this starts at the point (1,0) and goes anticlockwise around the circle of unit radius once.
- Note: I am not asked to show this is continuous, merely exhibit it.
- Note: The reason for the odd choice of sin for the x coordinate, and the minus signs is because my first choice was f:t↦(cos(π(t+1))sin(π(t+1))), however that didn't match up with the picture. The picture goes clockwise from the south pole, this would go anticlockwise from the east pole.
Part 2
Define an equivalence relation on [−1,1] by declaring −1∼1, use part 1 above and applying the topological version of passing to the quotient to find a continuous bijection: (:[−1,1]∼→S1)
Solution
We wish to apply passing to the quotient. Notice:
- we get π:[−1,1]→[−1,1]∼, π:x↦[x] automatically and it is continuous.
- we've already got a map, f, of the form (:[−1,1]→S1)
In order to use the theorem we must show:
- "f is constant on the fibres of π", that is:
- ∀x,y∈[−1,1][π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)]
- Proof:
- Let x,y∈[−1,1] be given
- Suppose π(x)≠π(y), by the nature of implies we do not care about the RHS of the implication, true or false, the implication holds, so we're done
- Suppose π(x)=π(y), we must show that this means f(x)=f(y)
- It is easy to see that if x∈(−1,1)⊂R then π(x)=π(y)⟹y=x
- By the nature of f being a function (only associating an element of the domain with one thing in the codomain) and having y=x we must have: f(x)=f(y)
- Suppose x∈{−1,1}, it is easy to see that then π(x)=π(y)⟹y∈{−1,1}
- But f(−1)=f(1) so, whichever the case, f(x)=f(y)
- It is easy to see that if x∈(−1,1)⊂R then π(x)=π(y)⟹y=x
- Let x,y∈[−1,1] be given
We may now apply the theorem to yield:
- a unique continuous map, ¯f:[−1,1]/∼→S1 such that f=¯f∘π
The question requires us to show this is a bijection, we must show that ˉf is both injective and surjective:
- Surjective: ∀y∈S1∃x∈[−1,1]∼[ˉf(x)=y]
- There are two ways to do this:
- Note that (from passing to the quotient) that if f is surjective, then the resulting ˉf is surjective.
- Or the long way of showing the definition of ˉf being a surjection, ∀y∈S1∃x∈[−1,1]∼[ˉf(x)=y]
- Let y∈S1 be given.
- Note that f is surjective, and f=ˉf∘π, thus ∃p∈[−1,1] such that p=f−1(y)=(ˉf∘π)−1(y)=π−1(ˉf−1(y)), thus π(p)=ˉf−1(y)
- Choose x∈[−1,1]/∼ to be π(p) where p∈[−1,1] exists by surjectivity of f and is such that f(p)=y
- Now ˉf(π(p))=f(p) (by definition of ˉf) and f(p)=y, as required.
- Let y∈S1 be given.
- There are two ways to do this:
- Injective:
- Let x,y∈[−1,1]∼ be given. We wish to show that ˉf(x)=ˉf(y)⟹x=y
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y), then we're done, as by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the right hand side.
- Note though, by the definition of ˉf being a function we cannot have x=y in this case! As a function must map each element of the domain to exactly one thing of the codomain. Anyway!
- Suppose ˉf(x)=ˉf(y), we must show that in this case we have x=y.
- By surjectivity of π:[−1,1]→[−1,1]∼ we see ∃a∈[−1,1][π(a)=x] and ∃b∈[−1,1][π(b)=y]
- Notice now we have ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and that (from the passing to the quotient part of obtaining ˉf) we have f=ˉf∘π, this means:
- ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a))=f(a), we also have ˉf(y)=ˉf(π(b))=f(b) from the same thoughts, but using y and b instead of x and a.
- In particular: f(a)=f(b)
- Now we have two cases, a∈(−1,1) and a∈{−1,1}, we shall deal with them separately.
- We have f(a)=f(b), suppose a∈(−1,1)
- Recall that our very definition of f required it to be "almost injective", specifically that f|(−1,1):(−1,1)→S1 was injective (and that it was only "not injective" on the endpoints)
- As f is "injective in this range" we see that to have f(a)=f(b) means a=b (by injectiveness of f|(−1,1))
- As a=b we see y=π(b)=π(a)=x and conclude y=x - as required.
- We have f(a)=f(b), and this time a∈{−1,1} instead
- Again by definition of f, we recall f(−1)=f(1) - it maps the endpoints of [−1,1] to the same point in S1.
- To have f(a)=f(b) clearly means that b∈{−1,1} (regardless of what value a∈{−1,1} takes)
- But π(a)=[a]={−1,1} and also π(b)=[b]={−1,1}
- So we see y=π(b)={−1,1}=π(a)=x, explicitly: x=y, as required
- We have f(a)=f(b), suppose a∈(−1,1)
- We have shown that in either case x=y
- Notice now we have ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and that (from the passing to the quotient part of obtaining ˉf) we have f=ˉf∘π, this means:
- By surjectivity of π:[−1,1]→[−1,1]∼ we see ∃a∈[−1,1][π(a)=x] and ∃b∈[−1,1][π(b)=y]
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y), then we're done, as by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the right hand side.
- Since x,y∈[−1,1]∼ was arbitrary, we have shown this for all x,y. The very definition of ˉf being injective.
- Let x,y∈[−1,1]∼ be given. We wish to show that ˉf(x)=ˉf(y)⟹x=y
Thus ˉf is a bijection
Part 3
Show that [−1,1]/∼ is homeomorphic to S1
Solution
To apply the "compact-to-Hausdorff theorem" we require:
- A continuous bijection, which we have, namely ˉf:[−1,1]∼→S1
- the domain space, [−1,1]∼, to be compact, and
- the codomain space, S1, to be Hausdorff
We know the image of a compact set is compact, and that closed intervals are compact in R, thus [−1,1]/∼=π([1−,1]) must be compact. We also know R2 is Hausdorff and every subspace of a Hausdorff space is Hausdorff, thus S1 is Hausdorff.
We apply the theorem:
- ˉf is a homeomorphism
Question 7
Let D2 denote the closed unit disk in R2 and define an equivalence relation on D2 by setting x1∼x2 if ∥x1∥=∥x2∥=1 ("collapsing the boundary to a single point"). Show that D2∼ is homeomorphic to S2 - the sphere.
- Hint: first define a surjection (:D2→S2) mapping all of ∂D2 to the north pole. This may be defined using a good picture or a formula.
Solution
Definitions:
- H denotes the hemisphere in my picture.
- E:D2→H is the composition of maps in my diagram that take D2, double its radius, then embed it in R3 then "pop it out" into a hemisphere. We take it as obvious that it is a homeomorphism
- f′:H→S2, this is the map in the top picture. It takes the hemisphere and pulls the boundary/rim in (along the blue lines) to the north pole of the red sphere. f′(∂H)=(0,0,1)∈R3, it should be clear that for all x∈H−∂H that f′(x) is intended to be a point on the red sphere and that f′|H−∂H is injective. It is also taken as clear that f′ is surjective
- Note: Click the pictures for a larger version
- D2∼ and D2/∼ denote the quotient space, with this definition we get a canonical projection, π:D2→D2/∼ given by π:x↦[x] where [x] denotes the equivalence class of x
- Lastly, we define f:D2→S2 to be the composition of E and f′, that is: f:=f′∘E, meaning f:x↦f′(E(x))
The situation is shown diagramatically below:
Outline of the solution:
- We then want apply the passing to the quotient theorem to yield a commutative diagram:
- Lastly, we will show that ˉf is a homeomorphism using the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem
Solution body
First we must show the requirements for applying passing to the quotient are satisfied.
- We know already the maps involved are continuous and that π is a quotient map. We only need to show:
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- ∀x,y∈D2[π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)]
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- Let us show this remaining condition:
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
- Suppose π(x)≠π(y), then by the nature of logical implication the implication is true regardless of f(x) and f(y)'s equality. We're done in this case.
- Suppose π(x)=π(y), we must show that in this case f(x)=y(y).
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- In this case we must have x=y, as otherwise we'd not have π(x)=π(y) (for x∈D2−∂D2 we have π(x)=[x]={x}, that is that the equivalence classes are singletons. So if π(x)=π(y) we must have π(y)=[y]={x}=[x]=π(x); so y can only be x)
- If x=y then by the nature of f being a function we must have f(x)=f(y), we're done in this case
- Suppose x∈∂D2 (the only case not covered) and π(x)=π(y), we must show f(x)=f(y)
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- E(x) is mapped to the boundary/rim of H, as is E(y) and f'(\text{any point on the rim of }H)=(0,0,1)\in\mathbb{R}^3
- Thus f'(E(x))=f'(E(y)), but f'(E(x)) is the very definition of f(x), so clearly:
- f(x)=f(y) as required.
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
We may now apply the passing to the quotient theorem. This yields:
- A continuous map, \bar{f}:D^2/\sim\rightarrow\mathbb{S}^2 where f=\bar{f}\circ\pi
In order to apply the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem and show \bar{f} is a homeomorphism we must show it is continuous and bijective. We already have continuity (as a result of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem), we must show it is bijective.
We must show \bar{f} is both surjective and injective:
- Surjectivity: We can get this from the definition of \bar{f} , recall on the passing to the quotient (function) page that:
- if f is surjective then \bar{f} (or \tilde{f} as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- I've already done it "the long way" once in this assignment, and I hope it is not frowned upon if I decline to do it again.
- if f is surjective then \bar{f} (or \tilde{f} as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- Injectivity: This follows a similar to gist as to what we've done already to show we could apply "passing to the quotient" and for the other questions where we've had to show a factored map is injective. As before:
- Let x,y\in\frac{D^2}{\sim} be given.
- Suppose \bar{f}(x)\ne\bar{f}(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Once again I note we must really have x\ne y as if x=y then by definition of \bar{f} being a function we must also have \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y), anyway!
- Suppose that \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y), we must show that in this case x=y.
- Note that by surjectivity of \pi that: \exists a\in D^2[\pi(a)=x] and \exists b\in D^2[\pi(b)=y], so \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(\pi(a)) and \bar{f}(y)=\bar{f}(\pi(b)), also, as \bar{f} was the result of factoring, we have f=\bar{f}\circ\pi, so we see \bar{f}(\pi(a))=f(a) and \bar{f}(\pi(b))=f(b), since \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and \bar{f}(\pi(a))=\bar{f}(\pi(b)) also.
- We now have 2 cases, a\in D^2-\partial D^2 and a\in \partial D^2 respectively:
- Suppose a\in D^2-\partial D^2
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b\ne a then f(b)\ne f(a), because f\big\vert_{D^2-\partial D^2}:(D^2-\partial D^2)\rightarrow\mathbb{S}^2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- If b=a then y=\pi(b)=\pi(a)=x so y=x as required (this is easily recognised as x=y)
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b\ne a then f(b)\ne f(a), because f\big\vert_{D^2-\partial D^2}:(D^2-\partial D^2)\rightarrow\mathbb{S}^2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- Suppose a\in\partial D^2
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b\in\partial D^2
- This means a\sim b, and that means \pi(a)=\pi(b)
- But y=\pi(b) and x=\pi(a), so we arrive at: x=\pi(a)=\pi(b)=y, or x=y, as required.
- This means a\sim b, and that means \pi(a)=\pi(b)
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b\in\partial D^2
- Suppose a\in D^2-\partial D^2
- We now have 2 cases, a\in D^2-\partial D^2 and a\in \partial D^2 respectively:
- Note that by surjectivity of \pi that: \exists a\in D^2[\pi(a)=x] and \exists b\in D^2[\pi(b)=y], so \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(\pi(a)) and \bar{f}(y)=\bar{f}(\pi(b)), also, as \bar{f} was the result of factoring, we have f=\bar{f}\circ\pi, so we see \bar{f}(\pi(a))=f(a) and \bar{f}(\pi(b))=f(b), since \bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and \bar{f}(\pi(a))=\bar{f}(\pi(b)) also.
- Suppose \bar{f}(x)\ne\bar{f}(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Let x,y\in\frac{D^2}{\sim} be given.
We now know \bar{f} is a continuous bijection.
Noting that D^2 is closed and bounded we can apply the Heine–Borel theorem to show D^2 is compact. As \pi:D^2\rightarrow\frac{D^2}{\sim} is continuous (see quotient topology for information) we can use "the image of a compact set is compact" to conclude that \frac{D^2}{\sim} is compact.
A subspace of a Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space, as \mathbb{S}^2 is a topological subspace of \mathbb{R}^3, \mathbb{S}^2 is Hausdorff.
We may now use the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem (as \bar{f} is a bijective continuous map between a compact space to a Hausdorff space) to show that \bar{f} is a homeomorphism
As we have found a homeomorphism between \frac{D^2}{\sim} and \mathbb{S}^2 we have shown they are homeomorphic, written:
- \frac{D^2}{\sim}\cong\mathbb{S}^2.
Section C
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Technically a diagram is said to commute if all paths through it yield equal compositions, this means that we also require f=f'\circ E, which we already have by definition of f!
- Jump up ↑ Actually:
- f\big\vert_{D^2-\partial D^2}:(D^2-\partial D^2)\rightarrow(\mathbb{S}^2-\{(0,0,1)\}) is bijective in fact!