Difference between revisions of "Notes:Basis for a topology/Attempt 2"
From Maths
(Created page with "==Overview== Last time I tried to merge the definitions, which got very confusing! This time I shall treat them as separate things and go from there. ==Definitions== Here we w...") |
m (Saving work) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
If we have a '''TBasis''' for a topological space then we may talk about its open sets differently: | If we have a '''TBasis''' for a topological space then we may talk about its open sets differently: | ||
* {{M|1=\forall U\in\mathcal{P}(X)\big[U\in\mathcal{J}\iff\big(\forall p\in U\exists B\in\mathcal{B}[p\in B\wedge B\subseteq U]\big)\big]}} | * {{M|1=\forall U\in\mathcal{P}(X)\big[U\in\mathcal{J}\iff\big(\forall p\in U\exists B\in\mathcal{B}[p\in B\wedge B\subseteq U]\big)\big]}} | ||
+ | ==Facts== | ||
+ | # {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''GBasis''' of {{M|X}} inducing {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}} {{M|\implies}} {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''TBasis''' for the {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}} | ||
+ | # {{Top.|X|J}} is a [[topological space]] with a '''TBasis''' {{M|\mathcal{B} }} {{M|\implies}} {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''GBasis''' and it generates {{Top.|X|J}} | ||
+ | ==Proof of facts== | ||
+ | # {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''GBasis''' of {{M|X}} inducing {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}} {{M|\implies}} {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''TBasis''' for the {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}} | ||
+ | #* Let {{M|\mathcal{B} }} be a '''GBasis''', suppose it generates the [[topological space]] {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}}, we will show it's also a '''TBasis''' of {{M|(X,\mathcal{J}')}} | ||
+ | #*# {{M|\forall B\in\mathcal{B}[B\in\mathcal{J}']}} must be shown | ||
+ | #*#* Let {{M|B\in\mathcal{B} }} be given. | ||
+ | #*#** Recall {{M|U\in\mathcal{J}'\iff\forall x\in U\exists B'\in\mathcal{B}[x\in B'\wedge B'\subseteq U]}} | ||
+ | #*#** Let {{M|x\in B}} be given. | ||
+ | #*#*** Choose {{M|1=B':=B}} | ||
+ | #*#**** {{M|x\in B'}} by definition, as {{M|1=x\in B'=B}} and | ||
+ | #*#**** we have {{M|B\subseteq B}}, by the [[implies-subset relation]], {{iff}} {{M|\forall p\in B[p\in B]}} which is trivial. | ||
+ | #*#** Thus {{M|B\in\mathcal{J}'}} | ||
+ | #*#* Since {{M|B\in\mathcal{B} }} was arbitrary we have shown {{M|\forall B\in\mathcal{B}[B\in\mathcal{J}']}} | ||
+ | #*# {{M|1=\forall U\in\mathcal{J}'\exists\{B_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}[\bigcup_{\alpha\in I}B_\alpha=U]}} must be shown | ||
+ | #*#* Let {{M|U\in\mathcal{J}'}} be given. | ||
+ | #*#** Then, as {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''GBasis''', by definition of the open sets generated: {{M|\forall x\in X\exists B\in\mathcal{B}[x\in B\wedge B\subseteq U]}} | ||
+ | #*#** Let {{M|p\in U}} be given | ||
+ | #*#*** Define {{M|1=B_p}} to be the {{M|B}} that exists such that {{M|p\in B_p}} and {{M|B_p\subseteq U}} | ||
+ | #*#** We now have an .... thing, like a sequence but arbitrary, {{M|(B_p)_{p\in U} }} or {{M|\{B_p\}_{p\in U} }} - I need to come down on a notation for this - such that: | ||
+ | #*#*** {{M|\forall B_p\in(B_p)_{p\in U}[p\in B_p\wedge B_p\subseteq U]}} | ||
+ | #*#** We must now show {{M|1=\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p=U}}, we can do this by showing {{M|\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\subseteq U}} and {{M|\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\supseteq U}} | ||
+ | #*#**# {{M|\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\subseteq U}} | ||
+ | #*#**#* Using the [[union of subsets is a subset of the union]] we see: | ||
+ | #*#**#** {{M|\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\subseteq U]}} | ||
+ | #*#**# {{M|U\subseteq\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p}} | ||
+ | #*#**#* Using the [[implies-subset relation]] we see: {{M|U\subseteq\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\iff\forall x\in U[x\in\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p]}}, we will show the RHS instead. | ||
+ | #*#**#** Let {{M|x\in U}} be given | ||
+ | #*#**#*** Recall, by definition of [[union]], {{M|x\in\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p\iff\exists q\in U[x\in B_q]}} | ||
+ | #*#**#**** Choose {{M|1=q:=x}} then we have {{M|x\in B_x}} (as {{M|p\in B_p}} is one of the defining conditions of choosing each {{M|B_p}}!) | ||
+ | #*#**#* Thus {{M|U\subseteq\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p}} | ||
+ | #*#** We have shown {{M|1=\bigcup_{p\in U}B_p=U}} | ||
+ | #*#* Since {{M|U\in\mathcal{J}'}} was arbitrary we have shown this for all {{M|U\in\mathcal{J}'}} | ||
+ | #*# We have now shown {{M|\mathcal{B} }} is a '''TBasis''' but not of what topology! {{Warning|Not finished!}} | ||
+ | #* This completes the proof. | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references group="Note"/> | <references group="Note"/> |
Revision as of 09:19, 8 August 2016
Overview
Last time I tried to merge the definitions, which got very confusing! This time I shall treat them as separate things and go from there.
Definitions
Here we will use GBasis for a generated topology (by a basis) and TBasis for a basis of an existing topology.
GBasis
Let X be a set and B⊆P(X) be a collection of subsets of X. Then we say:
- B is a GBasis if it satisfies the following 2 conditions:
Then B induces a topology on X.
Let JInduced denote this topology, then:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈JInduced⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])]
TBasis
Suppose (X,J) is a topological space and B⊆P(X) is some collection of subsets of X. We say:
- B is a TBasis if it satisfies both of the following:
- ∀B∈B[B∈J] - all the basis elements are themselves open.
- ∀U∈J∃{Bα}α∈I[⋃α∈IBα=U]
If we have a TBasis for a topological space then we may talk about its open sets differently:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈J⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])]
Facts
- B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J′) ⟹ B is a TBasis for the (X,J′)
- (X,J) is a topological space with a TBasis B ⟹ B is a GBasis and it generates (X,J)
Proof of facts
- B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J′) ⟹ B is a TBasis for the (X,J′)
- Let B be a GBasis, suppose it generates the topological space (X,J′), we will show it's also a TBasis of (X,J′)
- ∀B∈B[B∈J′] must be shown
- Let B∈B be given.
- Recall U∈J′⟺∀x∈U∃B′∈B[x∈B′∧B′⊆U]
- Let x∈B be given.
- Choose B′:=B
- x∈B′ by definition, as x∈B′=B and
- we have B⊆B, by the implies-subset relation, if and only if ∀p∈B[p∈B] which is trivial.
- Choose B′:=B
- Thus B∈J′
- Since B∈B was arbitrary we have shown ∀B∈B[B∈J′]
- Let B∈B be given.
- ∀U∈J′∃{Bα}α∈I[⋃α∈IBα=U] must be shown
- Let U∈J′ be given.
- Then, as B is a GBasis, by definition of the open sets generated: ∀x∈X∃B∈B[x∈B∧B⊆U]
- Let p∈U be given
- Define Bp to be the B that exists such that p∈Bp and Bp⊆U
- We now have an .... thing, like a sequence but arbitrary, (Bp)p∈U or {Bp}p∈U - I need to come down on a notation for this - such that:
- ∀Bp∈(Bp)p∈U[p∈Bp∧Bp⊆U]
- We must now show ⋃p∈UBp=U, we can do this by showing ⋃p∈UBp⊆U and ⋃p∈UBp⊇U
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U
- Using the union of subsets is a subset of the union we see:
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U]
- Using the union of subsets is a subset of the union we see:
- U⊆⋃p∈UBp
- Using the implies-subset relation we see: U⊆⋃p∈UBp⟺∀x∈U[x∈⋃p∈UBp], we will show the RHS instead.
- Let x∈U be given
- Recall, by definition of union, x∈⋃p∈UBp⟺∃q∈U[x∈Bq]
- Choose q:=x then we have x∈Bx (as p∈Bp is one of the defining conditions of choosing each Bp!)
- Recall, by definition of union, x∈⋃p∈UBp⟺∃q∈U[x∈Bq]
- Let x∈U be given
- Thus U⊆⋃p∈UBp
- Using the implies-subset relation we see: U⊆⋃p∈UBp⟺∀x∈U[x∈⋃p∈UBp], we will show the RHS instead.
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U
- We have shown ⋃p∈UBp=U
- Since U∈J′ was arbitrary we have shown this for all U∈J′
- Let U∈J′ be given.
- We have now shown B is a TBasis but not of what topology! Warning:Not finished!
- ∀B∈B[B∈J′] must be shown
- This completes the proof.
- Let B be a GBasis, suppose it generates the topological space (X,J′), we will show it's also a TBasis of (X,J′)
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Note that x∈B3⊆B1∩B2 is short for:
- x∈B3∧B3⊆B1∩B2
- Jump up ↑ Note that if B1∩B2 is empty (they do not intersect) then the logical implication is true regardless of the RHS of the ⟹} sign, so we do not care if we have x∈B3∧B3⊆B1∩B2! Pick any x∈X and aany B3∈B!