Difference between revisions of "Cauchy sequence"
From Maths
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | ==[[Cauchy sequence/Definition|Definition]]== |
− | + | {{:Cauchy sequence/Definition}} | |
− | * | + | ==Relation to [[Convergence (sequence)|convergence]]== |
− | + | * [[Every convergent sequence is Cauchy]] and | |
− | + | * [[In a complete metric space every Cauchy sequence converges]] | |
+ | {{Todo|Flesh this out}} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
+ | * [[Convergence of a sequence]] | ||
* [[Completeness]] | * [[Completeness]] | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 5 December 2015
Definition
Given a metric space (X,d) and a sequence (xn)∞n=1⊆X is said to be a Cauchy sequence[1][2] if:
In words it is simply:
- For any arbitrary distance apart, there exists a point such that any two points in the sequence after that point are within that arbitrary distance apart.
Relation to convergence
TODO: Flesh this out
See also
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Note that in Krzysztof Maurin's notation this is written as ⋀ϵ>0⋁N∈N⋀m,n>Nd(xn,xm)<ϵ - which is rather elegant
- Jump up ↑ It doesn't matter if we use n≥m>N or n,m≥N because if n=m then d(xn,xm)=0, it doesn't matter which way we consider them (as n>m or m>n) for d(x,y)=d(y,x) - I use the ordering to give the impression that as n goes out ahead it never ventures far (as in ϵ-distance}}) from xm. This has served me well
References
- Jump up ↑ Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici
- Jump up ↑ Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin